Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ordway Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$54kHuman Services$10kAnimals$2kCivil Rights$1kFood & Nutrition$950Community Improvement$500Environment$400
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$15,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$15,000
The Citadel Foundation$10,000
Focus on the Family$2,000
Best Friends Animal Society$1,986
Federalist Society$1,000
Disabled American Veterans Charitable Tr$1,000
Central Sierra Environmental Resour$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Central Sierra Environmental Resour: $200 → 14%PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%Maryknoll Sisters: $250 → 9%The Citadel Foundation: $10k → 12%PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $15k → 14%Best Friends Animal Society: $2k → 9%Focus on the Family: $2k → 9%Wheaton College Alumni Association: $1k → 7%Nature Conservancy: $100 → 7%Disabled American Veterans DAV Charita: $1k → 10%Disabled American Veterans Charitable Tr: $1k → 11%Friends of the Animal Community: $500 → 14%PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%Maryknoll Sisters: $250 → 9%Citadel Alumni Association Foundation: $1k → 12%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 → 14%Wheaton College Alumni Association: $500 → 7%Nature Conservancy: $100 → 7%Disabled American Veterans DAV Charita: $1k → 10%LIBERTY INSTITUTE USA: $500 → 14%PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%Maryknoll Sisters: $250 → 9%Citadel Alumni Association Foundation: $1k → 12%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $383 → 14%Wheaton College Alumni Association: $500 → 7%Disabled American Veterans DAV Charita: $1k → 10%Maryknoll Sisters: $200 → 9%Citadel Alumni Association Foundation: $1k → 12%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $300 → 14%Wheaton College Alumni Association: $500 → 7%Disabled American Veterans DAV Charita: $1k → 10%Citadel Alumni Association Foundation: $1k → 12%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $300 → 14%Wheaton College Alumni Association: $500 → 7%Disabled American Veterans DAV Charita: $1k → 10%Citadel Alumni Association Foundation: $1k → 12%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $300 → 14%Wheaton College Alumni Association: $500 → 7%Disabled American Veterans DAV Charita: $1k → 10%Citadel Alumni Association Foundation: $1k → 12%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $250 → 14%Wheaton College Alumni Association: $300 → 7%Disabled American Veterans DAV Charita: $1k → 10%Citadel Alumni Association Foundation: $1k → 12%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$36k · 6 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$36k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+108%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +35%
  • CA
    Citadel Alumni Association Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7k
  • DA
    Disabled American Veterans DAV Charita
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7k

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL COMMUNITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +108%
  • LI
    LIBERTY INSTITUTE USA
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
6
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
11
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
12
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Citadel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $17,283 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $16,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONTHE CITADEL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationTHE CITADEL FOUNDATIONCitadel Alumni Association Foundation — $7,000 · OtherCitadel Alumni Association FoundationDisabled American Veterans DAV Charita — $7,000 · OtherDisabled American Veterans DAV CharitaWheaton College Alumni Association — $3,800 · OtherWheaton College Alumni AssociationFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $2,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $1,250 · OtherDisabled American Veterans Charitable Tr — $1,000 · OtherMaryknoll Sisters — $950 · Other+3 more — $900 · OtherBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $1,986 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL COMMUNITY — $500 · Animals
Education$43,283Other$23,900Animals$2,486

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $17,283 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITADEL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $1,986 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL COMMUNITY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CITADEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL COMMUNITY
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ordway Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ordway Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ordway Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph