Skip to content

· Public charity

Orange County Bar Association Charitable Fund

As the charitable giving and fundraising arm of the orange county bar association, the ocba charitable fund provides resources to organizations and programs in order to enhance the system of justice and promote equal justice for all.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$904kCivil Rights$225kEducation$98kPublic Benefit$71kYouth Development$9k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $223k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$382k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUBLIC LAW CENTER$40,000
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION$40,000
VETERANS LEGAL INSTITUTE$25,000
COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SO CAL$20,000
ELDER LAW & DISABILITY RIGHTS CENTER (ELDR)$18,500
COLLABORATIVE COURTS FOUNDATION$15,000
PROJECT YOUTHOCBF$14,000
LAURA'S HOUSE$10,000
RADIANT FUTURES$10,000
UCI SCHOOL OF LAW$10,000
HUMAN OPTIONS$10,000
UCI SCHOOL OF LAW$10,000
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LAURA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $8k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $8k → 10%WOMEN'S TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $10k → 10%WOMEN'S TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $10k → 10%WOMEN'S TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 14 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$1.5M
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
0%

Still filing today

93%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $336k · revenue +14%
  • PL
    PUBLIC LAW CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $254k · revenue +89%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCAL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $213k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2025 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Counsel for Justice

CFJ promotes access to justice for underserved communities seeking to assert their legal rights. Our pro bono-based projects bridge the gap for underserved communities seeking safety, stability, and justice. CFJ engages volunteer attorneys…

—
2
Inland Counties Legal Services

Inland Counties Legal Services (ICLS) mission is to pursue justice and equality for low-income individuals through counsel, advice, advocacy, and community education, treating all with dignity and respect. Over the last six decades, ICLS…

Crime & Legal
3
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
4
Community Lawyers Inc

Community Lawyers, Inc. provides underserved low- and no-income community members access to legal representation, pro-bono legal clinics, and community advocacy and engagement.

Crime & Legal
5
California Lawyers Foundation

The California Lawyers Foundation shares a common mission with the California Lawyers Association of promoting excellence, diversity, and inclusion in the legal profession and fairness in the administration of justice and the rule of law.…

Education
6
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
7
Center for Conflict Resolution

To empower communities, organizations and individuals to handle disputes constructively by developing and designing appropriate and creative solutions that address all interests, needs, and values.

—
8
Orlando Center for Justice

Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.s mission is to bridge the access to justice gap in Florida for newcomers by helping these underserved communities navigate the legal system through education and innovation. We also walk alongside them,…

Crime & Legal
9
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
10
Community Legal Services

Community Legal Services was established to ensure the best interests of the public are represented by participating and intervening before the California Public Utilities Commission, and all other municipal, state, or federal regulatory…

Crime & Legal
11
Orange County Trial Lawyers Charities

The primary purpose of the orange county trial lawyers' charities (octlc) is to make a positive difference in the quality of life for people within the greater orange county area, focusing on issues related to education, children,…

Human Services
12
Los Angeles Center for Law and Justice

The survivor justice center secures justice for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowers them to create their own future.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Public Law Center; the most unlike its peers is Chapman University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUBLIC LAW CENTER: $254,000 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC LAW CENTERCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCAL: $212,500 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCALThe Collaborative Courts Foundation: $83,000 · Crime & LegalThe Collaborative Courts FoundationOrange County Bar Foundation: $37,500 · Crime & LegalOrange County Bar FoundationCONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $336,000 · Civil RightsCONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOU…+1 more: $7,500 · Civil RightsVETERANS LEGAL INSTITUTE: $210,000 · Housing & ShelterVETERANS LEGAL …LAURA'S HOUSE: $65,000 · Human ServicesLAURA'S HOUS…Human Options Inc: $65,000 · Human ServicesHuman Option…WOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $44,500 · Human ServicesWOMENS TRANS…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $85,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · EducationCHAPMAN U…Elder Law and Disability Rights Center: $63,000 · OtherWOMEN'S TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $15,500 · OtherORANGE COUNTY JUSTICE FUND: $13,000 · Other
Crime & Legal$587,000Civil Rights$343,500Housing & Shelter$210,000Human Services$174,500Education$130,000Other$91,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY: $336,000 over 9y, 14% of budgetPUBLIC LAW CENTER: $254,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCAL: $212,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetVETERANS LEGAL INSTITUTE: $210,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Collaborative Courts Foundation: $83,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $65,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHuman Options Inc: $65,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetElder Law and Disability Rights Center: $63,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $44,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOrange County Bar Foundation: $37,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetORANGE COUNTY JUSTICE FUND: $13,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SOCAL ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS LEGAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Collaborative Courts Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Human Options Inc ↗
  • Who funds Elder Law and Disability Rights Center ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Bar Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY JUSTICE FUND ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Orange County Bar Association Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Orange County Bar Association Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Orange County Bar Association Charitable Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Orange County Bar Association Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Orange County Bar Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph