Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Opelousas General Hospital Foundation Inc

Develop and cultivate philanthropy and collaborative relationships within the community to support and enhance the programs and services offered through opelousas general hospital system to improve the health of the communities it serves.

$308k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$200kHealth$68kReligion$51kPhilanthropy$25kHuman Services$19kOther$67k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $208,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $308,336 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $100,336 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIKING BOOSTER CLUB$200,000
THE REFINERY MISSION$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%HOPE FOR OPELOUSAS: $10k → 28%HOPE FOR OPELOUSAS: $9k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 49% of Opelousas General Hospital Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in LA; read by stated purpose it is 51% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Opelousas General Hospital Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$138k · 5 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$138k
$67k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE REFINERY MISSION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +217%
  • MP
    MILES PERRET CANCER SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $22k · revenue +91%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR OPELOUSAS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $19k · revenue +873%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • OG
    OPELOUSAS GENERAL HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VIKING BOOSTERS INC — $200,000 · EducationVIKING BOOSTERS INCEUNICE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $30,779 · HealthEUNICE COMMUNITY …MILES PERRET CANCER SERVICES — $21,624 · HealthMILES PERRET CANC…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $15,750 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…Individual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant …OPELOUSAS GENERAL HEALTH SYSTEM — $6,853 · OtherOPELOUSAS GENERAL…THE REFINERY MISSION — $51,062 · ReligionTHE REFINERY …Community Foundation of Acadiana — $25,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE FOR OPELOUSAS INC — $19,112 · Human Services
Education$200,000Health$68,153Other$66,853Religion$51,062Philanthropy$25,000Human Services$19,112

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE REFINERY MISSION — $51,062 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetEUNICE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $30,779 over 3y, 20% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Acadiana — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILES PERRET CANCER SERVICES — $21,624 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE FOR OPELOUSAS INC — $19,112 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $15,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mills Family Foundation IncLA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mills Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Acadiana · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Opelousas General Hospital Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Opelousas General Hospital Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Opelousas General Hospital Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $117k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph