Skip to content

· Private foundation

Onset Gives

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$265kFood & Nutrition$243kEducation$115kPhilanthropy$26kInternational$21kRecreation & Sports$15kHousing & Shelter$6kPublic Benefit$180Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$115,000
WEUPLIFTU FOUNDATION$20,000
ESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 21% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HopeKids: $10k → 11%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $115k → 11%The Children's Tumor Foundation: $3k → 17%Sam's Club: $3k → 8%WEUPLIFTU FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%Make A Wish Foundation: $9k → 8%ESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES: $15k → 8%Give Smart: $6k → 8%Amazoncom Inc: $18k → 9%Walgreens: $103 → 8%Scheels: $180 → 12%Utah Food Bank: $193k → 8%5 FOR THE FIGHT: $16k → 8%UTAH FOOD BANK: $50k → 8%PRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $172k → 8%PRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $55k → 8%OTHER GRANTS & CONTRIBUTIONS: $12k → 8%OTHER GRANTS & CONTRIBUTIONS: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
IL
NY
UT
AZ
AR
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$484k · 3 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$484k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+99%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2020–2022 · $243k · revenue +53%
  • PC
    PRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $227k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2020 · $14k

Funded once

  • AI
    Amazoncom Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • 5F
    5 FOR THE FIGHT
    one grant, 2018 · $16k
  • HI
    HOPEKIDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +114%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miracle Flights

Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.

—
2
Frontline to Field Foundation

Frontline to field is a nonprofit organization founded from the hearts of two individuals deeply committed to the well-being of those who serve and sacrifice for others. inspired by their personal connections to the military, first…

Recreation & Sports
3
Super Heroes With Super Kids
Philanthropy
4
Heroes for Heroes

The goals behind our charity and the process as a realtor i have had the privilege to sell homes to veterans, active duty, and teachers alike. from the hours they put in, the risks they take, and the service they provide, its the least i…

Human Services
5
Gamechanger Charity

Gamechanger leverages technology and innovation to help children and their families who encounter life threatening illnesses.

Health
6
Children's Flight of Hope

Children's flight of hope (cfoh) provides flights to essential, life-changing, and life-saving medical care for children in need. together with our donors, partners, and champions, we help ease the emotional and financial burden on…

Health
7
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
9
The Christmas Box International

The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…

Community Improvement
10
Chase the Victory Corporation

Our mission is to strengthen the support of families grieving the loss of a child, fighting childhood cancer, and inspire hope and kindness.

Human Services
11
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Road Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH FOOD BANK: $242,914 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKPRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $226,901 · OtherPRIMARY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONAmazoncom Inc: $18,379 · Other+7 more: $47,780 · Other+7 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUN…WEUPLIFTU FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthHOPEKIDS INC: $9,850 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ROAD HOME: $6,102 · Human Services
Other$535,974Education$115,000Health$32,850Youth Development$15,000Human Services$6,102

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $242,914 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEUPLIFTU FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetHOPEKIDS INC: $9,850 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $8,990 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $6,102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Onset Gives funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Onset Gives. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Onset Gives?

    Find your warmest path to Onset Gives through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Onset Gives’ filings →

    More from the funding graph