Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Oneamerica

ONEAMERICA advances the fundamental principles of democracy and justice at the local, state and national levels by building power within immigrant communities in collaboration with key allies.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$107k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$3.5MCivil Rights$1.0MInternational$561kArts & Culture$122kCommunity Improvement$106kEducation$63kCrime & Legal$59kEnvironment$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $1,032,261 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,060,601 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,340 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $845k
$72,493
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE$107,417
HORN OF AFRICA SERVICESHOAS$102,931
ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICESACRS$102,181
KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATIONKWA$101,725
HAND IN HAND IMMIGRATION SERVICESHH$96,216
CHINESE INFORMATION & SERVICE CENTERCISC$95,906
LA CASA HOGARLCH$83,101
WORLD RELIEF SEATTLE$82,617
NUESTRA CASA$72,493
REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST$36,647
LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWESTLCSNW$33,493
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANECCEW$29,134
NORTHWEST IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT$28,764
KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER KCSC$17,667
GRUPOCAFE$14,187
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Promise Arizona: $117k → 11%Lutheran Comm Serv NW: $57k → 12%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $109k → 9%LA CASA HOGARLCH: $104k → 17%Lutheran Comm Serv NW: $48k → 12%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICESACRS: $102k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $107k → 9%NUESTRA CASA: $72k → 11%LA CASA HOGARLCH: $83k → 17%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWESTLCSNW: $43k → 12%ACRS: $74k → 9%NUESTRA CASA: $46k → 11%La Casa Hogar: $79k → 17%Lutheran Comm Serv NW: $37k → 12%ACRS: $74k → 9%NUESTRA CASA: $34k → 11%La Casa Hogar: $56k → 17%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NORTHWESTLCSNW: $33k → 12%ACRS: $70k → 9%LA CASA HOGAR: $51k → 17%ACRS: $66k → 9%La Casa Hogar: $51k → 17%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICESACRS: $65k → 9%La Casa Hogar: $42k → 17%ACRS: $64k → 9%KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATIONKWA: $102k → 9%La Casa Hogar: $35k → 17%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICES: $53k → 9%KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATIONKWA: $79k → 9%Korean Womens Association: $60k → 9%KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $55k → 9%Korean Womens Association: $49k → 9%Korean Womens Association: $49k → 9%Korean Womens Association: $39k → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION & SERVICE CENTERCISC: $96k → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION & SERVICE CENTERCISC: $69k → 9%CISC-Chinese Info & Service: $40k → 9%CISC-Chinese Info & Service: $39k → 9%CISC-Chinese Info & Service: $37k → 9%HORN OF AFRICA SERVICESHOAS: $103k → 9%CISC-Chinese Info & Service: $33k → 9%HORN OF AFRICA SERVICESHOAS: $83k → 9%CISC-Chinese Info & Service: $32k → 9%HORN OF AFRICA SERVICES: $36k → 9%Horn of Africa Services: $35k → 9%Horn of Africa Services: $35k → 9%Horn of Africa Services: $35k → 9%Horn of Africa Services: $34k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 44% of Oneamerica’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 47% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Oneamericalessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.2M · 22 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$5.2M
$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+14%

Still filing today

95%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementInternationalEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $568k · revenue +93%
  • LC
    LA CASA HOGAR
    8× · 2017–2024 · $501k · revenue +328%
  • KW
    KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $439k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • WW
    Win Win Network
    one grant, 2017 · $106k · revenue -43%
  • CL
    COLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -63%
  • PS
    PUGET SOUND SAGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asians for Collective Action

Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.

Public Benefit
2
Skagit Legal Aid

To provide access to justice for low income and historically marginalized individuals through 1) providing free legal services to those persons who by reason of poverty and unable to effectively access the legal system, 2) promoting, and…

Crime & Legal
3
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
4
Refugee Womens Alliance

ReWA is a non-profit, multi-ethnic organization that promotes inclusion, independence, personal leadership, and strong communities by providing refugee and immigrant women and their families with culturally and linguistically appropriate…

Human Services
5
Wakulima Usa

Our Food Production Center will serve as our primary storage production and distribution facility. The coop will aggregate purchase store and distribute farm inputs for members and will act as an integrator collecting the output from…

Food & Nutrition
6
Refugee Care Collective Northwest

Provide care to refugee families.

Human Services
7
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
8
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission

Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…

Human Services
9
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
10
Council On American-Islamic Relations

CAIR WA is a civil rights and advocacy organization dedicated to enhancing the understanding of Islam, protecting civil rights, promoting justice, and empowering American Muslims. The main goal of our programs and services is to provide…

Human Services
11
Chinese Newcomers Service Center

The Organization provides underserved communities with social, economic workforce and business services to transform their lives. To assist non-English speaking Chinese immigrant families to adjust to a new way of life in the U.S..

Human Services
12
Immigrant Womens Community Center

The mission of the Immigrant Women's Community Center is to provide community building, training, and direct services, primarily for immigrant women and their families, promoting financial independence, emotional health, and physical…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and the most unlike its peers is Somali Family Safety Task Force Somali Family Safety Task Force. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%3%<5yr16%3%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr12%25%35–55yr12%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%2%<5yr16%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr12%30%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
15%
7,112/48,498

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE — $568,009 · Human ServicesASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICELA CASA HOGAR — $500,929 · Human ServicesLA CASA HOGARKOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION — $439,079 · Human ServicesKOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATIONChinese Information and Service Center — $372,808 · Human ServicesChinese Information and Service CenterHORN OF AFRICA SERVICES — $368,853 · Human ServicesHORN OF AFRICA SERVICESTacoma Community House — $321,841 · Human ServicesTacoma Community HouseLutheran Community Services Northwest — $298,406 · Human ServicesLutheran Community Services NorthwestNuestra CASA — $198,601 · Human ServicesNuestra CASAPROMISE ARIZONA — $167,300 · Human ServicesKITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER — $117,571 · Human Services+6 more — $166,444 · Human ServicesMISSIO DEI CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE — $519,929 · OtherMISSIO DEI CHURCH…REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST — $183,317 · OtherREFUGEE & IMMIGRA…NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $150,337 · OtherNORTHWEST IMMIGRA…+1 more — $15,000 · OtherWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $413,492 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR FOOD AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY INC — $20,000 · InternationalFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $174,300 · Civil RightsTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $167,300 · Civil RightsCOLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO — $30,000 · Civil RightsWin Win Network — $106,243 · Community ImprovementKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER — $17,667 · Community ImprovementTeamChild — $13,698 · Community ImprovementWest African Community Council — $76,870 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMUNITY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF FAMILY EDUCATION — $52,307 · EducationLITERACY SOURCE A COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER — $10,777 · EducationPUGET SOUND SAGE — $20,000 · Social Science
Human Services$3,519,841Other$868,583International$433,492Civil Rights$371,600Community Improvement$137,608Arts & Culture$76,870Education$63,084Social Science$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE — $568,009 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLA CASA HOGAR — $500,929 over 8y, 12% of budgetKOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION — $439,079 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $413,492 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetChinese Information and Service Center — $372,808 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHORN OF AFRICA SERVICES — $368,853 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetTacoma Community House — $321,841 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest — $298,406 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNuestra CASA — $198,601 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES NORTHWEST — $183,317 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $174,300 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetPROMISE ARIZONA — $167,300 over 2y, 11% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $167,300 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT — $150,337 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetKITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER — $117,571 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetWin Win Network — $106,243 over 1y, 10% of budgetWest African Community Council — $76,870 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE — $69,134 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF FAMILY EDUCATION — $52,307 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $36,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPUGET SOUND SAGE — $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FOOD AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE — $19,667 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA — $19,248 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER — $17,667 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $14,062 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeamChild — $13,698 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLITERACY SOURCE A COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER — $10,777 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC — $8,333 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationInatai FoundationPhilanthropy NorthwestSchool's Out Washingt…Colectiva Legal del P…Front and CenteredPerigee FundThe Satterberg Founda…Gates FoundationWashington Progress F…Sheng-Yen Lu Foundati…The Norcliffe Foundat…
Seattle FoundationWA43.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Philanthropy Northwest · School's Out Washington · Colectiva Legal del Pueblo · Front and Centered · Perigee Fund · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · Washington Progress Fund · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oneamerica funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home