Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

One Mind

ONE MIND harnesses the power of science and lived experience to improve mental health outcomes for individuals, families, and society.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$19MEducation$3.8MScience & Tech$300k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
  • $250k+3 grants · $900k
$300,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$300,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$300,000
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$300,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH$102,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE BROAD INSTITUTE INC: $471k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $271k → 11%ALTO NEUROSCIENCE INC: $100k → 8%BUCKELEW PORGRAM: $1.4M → 8%HEALTHY BRAINS GLOBAL INITITIAVE INC: $1.1M → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $250k → 10%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $300k → 11%AIM FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $100k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $300k → 14%REGENTS OF UC DAVIS: $300k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $300k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $300k → 17%MAX PLANCK FLORIDA INST FOR NEUROSCIENCE: $300k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $250k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $300k → 21%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $300k → 12%YALE UNIVERSITY: $300k → 12%THE MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $2.0M → 13%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $300k → 14%WETA: $125k → 7%FNIH: $500k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $250k → 19%HEALTHY BRAINS GLOBAL INITIATIVE INC: $959k → 9%REGENTS OF UC IRVINE: $300k → 10%REGENTS OF UC DAVIS: $300k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $300k → 17%THE MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $1.5M → 13%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $300k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH: $103k → 8%ONE MIND ALL MEDIA: $612k → 9%UCLA FOUNDATION: $450k → 14%REGENTS OF UC DAVIS: $300k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE MT SINAI: $300k → 17%THE MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA: $1.0M → 13%FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH: $100k → 8%ONE MIND FOR RESEARCH INC: $587k → 9%UCLA FOUNDATION: $300k → 14%REGENTS OF UC DAVIS: $166k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $250k → 17%THE MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $500k → 13%PSYBERGUIDE: $256k → 9%UCLA FOUNDATION: $200k → 14%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $250k → 17%THE MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA: $500k → 13%ONE MIND CATLAYST FUND: $239k → 9%THE MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $500k → 13%BRAIN WAVES: $160k → 9%UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $112k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 10 repeat orgs$7.8M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
29

Total granted

$14M
$7.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+32%

Still filing today

40%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsScience & TechArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $6.2M · revenue +145%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    4× · 2017–2023 · $820k · revenue +58%
  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2021–2024 · $600k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • BP
    BUCKELEW PROGRAMSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.4M · revenue +88%
  • OM
    ONE MIND
    one grant, 2021 · $1.3M · revenue +20%
  • HB
    HEALTHY BRAINS GLOBAL INITIATIVE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $959k · revenue -32% · 38% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyCancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%55%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%65%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,519

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $6,162,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INCICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $820,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAITHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $600,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CI…Yale University — $500,000 · Education+9 more — $1,348,512 · Education+9 moreONE MIND AT WORK INC — $1,680,240 · HealthONE MIND AT WORK INCBUCKELEW PROGRAMS — $1,350,000 · HealthBUCKELEW PROGRAMSONE MIND — $1,273,727 · HealthONE MINDFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc — $702,500 · HealthFoundation for the National In…The Broad Institute Inc — $471,264 · HealthThe Broad Institute IncMax Planck Florida Corporation — $300,000 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $300,000 · Health+3 more — $220,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS — $1,542,900 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVI…REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $950,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $676,283 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF …REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $550,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF …UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $471,368 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN …WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE — $300,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN — $300,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $250,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $250,000 · Other+8 more — $212,497 · OtherHEALTHY BRAINS GLOBAL INITIATIVE INC — $958,533 · Science & TechNorthwestern University — $600,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $125,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWELL HEALTH INC — $45,000 · Community Improvement
Education$9,430,512Health$6,297,731Other$6,103,048Science & Tech$958,533Recreation & Sports$600,000Arts & Culture$125,000Community Improvement$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $6,162,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetONE MIND AT WORK INC — $1,680,240 over 2y, 66% of budgetBUCKELEW PROGRAMS — $1,350,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetONE MIND — $1,273,727 over 1y, 15% of budgetHEALTHY BRAINS GLOBAL INITIATIVE INC — $958,533 over 1y, 38% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $820,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc — $702,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $471,264 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University — $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMax Planck Florida Corporation — $300,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $271,196 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR CURES FOUNDATION FORMERLY ALLIANCE FOR STEM CELL RESEARCH — $100,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $24,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $7,166 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $6,090 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization One Mind funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Max Planck Florida Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines