Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Olivia Jones Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$446k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$433k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$454kInternational$142kAnimals$36kCivil Rights$10kHealth$4kEnvironment$1kFood & Nutrition$1k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $250k+1 grant · $433k
$433,108
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Olivia Jones Family Charitable Fund$433,108
Vehicles For Charity$12,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Olivia Jones Family Charitable Fund: $433k → 10%Rainforest Alliance: $1k → 17%Animal Welfare Institute: $5k → 14%Community First Foundation: $7k → 7%Water for People: $5k → 8%ALLERGY SAFE KIDS: $2k → 12%Doctors Without Borders: $5k → 17%Animal Welfare Institute: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%Water for People: $5k → 8%Denver Dumb Friends League: $1k → 12%Doctors Without Borders: $5k → 17%Animal Welfare Institute: $5k → 14%Water for People: $4k → 8%ALLERGY SAFE KIDS: $1k → 12%Doctors Without Borders: $5k → 17%ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $5k → 14%DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $1k → 12%Doctors Without Borders: $4k → 17%ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $4k → 14%Denver Dumb Friends League: $1k → 12%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $6k → 17%ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $4k → 14%Dumb Friends League: $1k → 12%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%Animal Welfare Institute: $4k → 14%ALLERGY SAFE KIDS: $1k → 12%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%Share Our Strength: $1k → 14%Vehicles For Charity: $13k → 12%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $4k → 17%WATER FOR PEOPLE: $6k → 12%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $3k → 17%WATER FOR PEOPLE: $5k → 12%AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA: $3k → 17%WATER FOR PEOPLE: $5k → 12%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $13k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $13k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $12k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $12k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $5k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $5k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$192k · 8 repeat orgs$448k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$192k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+19%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $446k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $64k · revenue +81%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +98%
  • AW
    ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $32k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • RA
    RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +19%
  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
7
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
8
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
12
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water for People and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Olivia Jones Family Charitable Fund — $433,108 · OtherOlivia Jones Family Charitable Fund+6 more — $40,711 · Other+6 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC — $64,150 · InternationalInternational Rescue C…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $35,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIER…WATER FOR PEOPLE — $30,322 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLEANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE — $32,000 · AnimalsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $4,039 · AnimalsCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $8,133 · Philanthropy
Other$473,819International$129,472Animals$36,039Philanthropy$8,133

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $64,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE — $32,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE — $30,322 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $8,133 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLERGY SAFE KIDS INC — $4,041 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $4,039 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALLERGY SAFE KIDS INC
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Olivia Jones Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Olivia Jones Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Olivia Jones Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph