Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oliver Charitable Corporation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$482k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$253k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$905kReligion$584kHealth$533kFood & Nutrition$433kArts & Culture$171kAnimals$94kRecreation & Sports$11kCrime & Legal$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $212k
  • $250k+1 grant · $253k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UAMS$252,860
SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH$112,000
UAMS$50,000
ARKANSAS FOOD BANK$50,000
ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH FOUNDATION$15,000
ROBERT J WILLIAMS MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER: $100k → 9%Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas: $5k → 14%CRYSTAL BRIDGES MUSEUM: $83k → 8%ROBERT J WILLIAMS MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT: $3k → 17%ARKANSAS CANINE SEARCH SPECIALIST: $4k → 19%Second Harvest Food Bank: $3k → 15%Mayo Clinic Rochester: $100k → 9%Crystal Bridges Museum: $50k → 8%ROBERT J WILLIAMS MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT: $2k → 17%Mayo Clinic Rochester: $75k → 9%Crystal Bridges Museum: $38k → 8%ROBERT J WILLIAMS MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT: $2k → 17%Robert J Williams Memorial Golf Tournament: $2k → 17%ROBERT J WILLIAMS MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT: $2k → 17%Children's Advocacy Centers: $10k → 17%UAMS: $505k → 17%UAMS: $253k → 17%UAMS FOUNDATION: $250k → 17%UAMS: $50k → 17%ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%Arkansas Game & Fish Foundation: $15k → 17%ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%ARKANSAS GAME & FISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%Arkansas Game and Fish Foundation: $15k → 17%Arkansas Food Bank: $125k → 17%ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $75k → 17%ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $75k → 17%ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $55k → 17%Arkansas Food Bank: $50k → 17%ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $50k → 17%SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH: $112k → 17%SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH: $110k → 17%SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH: $104k → 17%SECOND SERVING FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH: $54k → 17%Second Baptist Church: $53k → 17%Second Baptist Church: $51k → 17%THE ANTHONY SCHOOL: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 6 repeat orgs$472k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$2.0M
$472k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
0%

Still filing today

33%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionReligionAnimalsEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U
    UAMS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $807k
  • SB
    SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $484k
  • AF
    ARKANSAS FOODBANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $430k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +17%
  • TA
    THE ANTHONY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +22%
  • SS
    SECOND SERVING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0% · 51% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Health Group

To be the state's preeminent physician organization - linked to baptist health and dedicated to meeting the needs of patients, employers and physicians through cost effective, high quality care and superior clinical outcomes.

Health
2
Arkansas Farm Bureau Foundation

Arkansas farm bureau foundation (the "foundation") is organized for charitable and educational purposes to further the understanding of agricultural and rural issues, and to support the agricultural and rural community through financial…

Food & Nutrition
3
Arkansas Bankers Association Foundation
Philanthropy
4
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
5
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

—
6
Arkansas Children's Hospital Auxiliary

The purpose of the auxiliary of arkansas children's hospital is to raise funds for and render service to arkansas children's hospital and its patients through various fundraising and volunteer activities.

Philanthropy
7
Food Bank of North Central Arkansas

Food bank that distributes food supplies to families in need in nine counties.

Food & Nutrition
8
Arkansas Policy Foundation

The arkansas policy foundation is a not-for-profit think tank that conducts research and analyzes the impact of public policies on the people of arkansas. the foundation was founded in 1995 and emphasizes the importance of education and…

Crime & Legal
9
Arkansas Pharmacy Foundation

Promote profession of pharmacy in the state of arkansas.

Health
10
Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc

Food distribution to the hungry throughout an eight county service territory in Southeast Texas.

Human Services
11
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Arkansas Children's Hospital

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UAMS: $807,389 · OtherUAMSSECOND BAPTIST CHURCH: $484,000 · OtherSECOND BAPTIST CHURCHCRYSTAL BRIDGES MUSEUM: $170,661 · OtherCRYSTAL BRIDGES MUSEUMTHE ANTHONY SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherTHE ANTHONY SCHOOL+3 more: $25,000 · OtherARKANSAS FOODBANK: $430,000 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS FOODBANK+1 more: $3,000 · Food & NutritionMAYO CLINIC: $275,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+1 more: $5,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…SECOND SERVING FOUNDATION: $100,000 · ReligionARKANSAS GAME AND FISH FOUNDATION: $90,000 · Animals
Other$1,587,050Food & Nutrition$433,000Health$280,000Education$250,000Religion$100,000Animals$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $430,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $275,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ANTHONY SCHOOL: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSECOND SERVING FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetARKANSAS GAME AND FISH FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANTHONY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SECOND SERVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oliver Charitable Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oliver Charitable Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oliver’s filings →

    More from the funding graph