Skip to content

· Public charity

Oklahoma Community Service Commission Inc

The mission of the oklahoma community service commission is to engage oklahomans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service which supports americorps programs in oklahoma communities.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$993k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$8.5MEducation$4.2MPublic Benefit$2.3MHuman Services$2.2MEmployment$37k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $257k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$291,141
Median grant
2
States reached
$782k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED RIVER COMMUNITY CORPS$993,018
CAMP FIRE USA GREEN COUNTRY$319,127
JENNINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$291,141
PROJECT TRANSFORMATION$131,456
LILYFIELD INC$125,547
TEACH FOR AMERICA$39,002
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $141k → 24%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $114k → 24%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $111k → 24%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $110k → 24%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $103k → 24%LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $42k → 24%LILYFIELD INC: $154k → 16%LILYFIELD INC: $149k → 16%LILYFIELD INC: $126k → 16%LILYFIELD INC: $115k → 16%LILYFIELD INC: $102k → 16%LILYFIELD INC: $55k → 16%LILYFIELD: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 9 repeat orgs$362k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$17M
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+2%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RR
    RED RIVER COMMUNITY CORPS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.1M · revenue +44% · 86% of their budget
  • CITY YEAR INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2.3M · revenue +15%
  • CF
    CAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • OP
    OKEENE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $171k
  • CI
    CITIES IN SCHOOLS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $82k · revenue -79%
  • NL
    NATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $71k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
2
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
3
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
4
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
5
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
6
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
7
Employment Connection

Employment connection is a nonprofit st. louis community asset whose mission is "to assist individuals with limited opportunities to self sufficiency" including those recovering from substance abuse, the homeless, low-income individuals…

—
8
American Council of Young Political Leaders

Acypl's mission is to design and conduct bilateral and multilateral international educational exchanges designed to promote mutual understanding, respect, and friendship and to cultivate long-lasting relationships among tomorrow's global…

International
9
Capitol Commission Inc

To minister to the capitol community and to government leaders in states across the nation.

Religion
10
Firelight Foundation

Firelight supports catalytic community-based organizations in eastern and southern africa that work with their own communities to realize shared visions of sustainable change and true potential for children and youth.

International
11
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
12
Christ in Youth Inc

Christian development of youth and leaders

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cities in Schools Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY YEAR INC: $2,276,461 · OtherCITY YEAR INCJENNINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,866,898 · OtherJENNINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLSCAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC: $1,329,407 · OtherCAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INCPUTNAM CITY SCHOOLS: $994,062 · OtherPUTNAM CITY SCHOOLSOKLAHOMA METHODIST CONFERENCE: $861,867 · OtherOKLAHOMA METHODIST CONFERENCE+2 more: $207,932 · OtherRED RIVER COMMUNITY CORPS INC: $7,135,931 · Youth DevelopmentRED RIVER COMMUNITY CORPS INCLILYFIELD INC: $707,806 · Human ServicesLIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $619,662 · Human ServicesTeach for America Inc: $1,074,462 · EducationCITIES IN SCHOOLS INC: $82,430 · EducationNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC: $71,469 · Public Benefit
Other$7,536,627Youth Development$7,135,931Human Services$1,327,468Education$1,156,892Public Benefit$71,469

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRED RIVER COMMUNITY CORPS INC: $7,135,931 over 8y, 86% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $2,276,461 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC: $1,329,407 over 7y, 25% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $1,074,462 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLILYFIELD INC: $707,806 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetLIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $619,662 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCITIES IN SCHOOLS INC: $82,430 over 1y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC: $71,469 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTHWORKS: $36,896 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RED RIVER COMMUNITY CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds LILYFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIES IN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oklahoma Community Service Commission Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oklahoma Community Service Commission Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Lift Community Action Agency Inc: 43% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Red River Community Corps Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oklahoma Community Service Commission’s filings →

More from the funding graph