· Public charity
Oklahoma Association of Community Action
To alleviate the causes of poverty by supporting oklahoma's community action agencies, which includes providing coordinated services, training and other assitance to member agencies.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $94k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $413k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAP SYSTEMS INC | $138,717 |
| ARKANSAS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES ASSOCIATION INC | $68,500 |
| ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPS OF LOUISIANA | $68,500 |
| TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES | $68,500 |
| NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION | $68,500 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF OKC | $39,901 |
| KI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION | $18,254 |
| NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY | $12,792 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORP | $11,800 |
| OPPORTUNITIES | $10,889 |
| INCA COMMUNITY SERVICES | $9,656 |
| SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP | $8,523 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM | $5,832 |
| LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY | $5,367 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $519k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $139k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES INC3× · 2020–2024 · $228k · revenue +8%
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF OKLAHOMA CITY & OKLAHOMA/CANADIAN COUNTIES3× · 2022–2024 · $94k · revenue +2%
- KBKI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $77k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- NMNew Mexico Assoc of Comm Actone grant, 2020 · $79k
- TTACAAone grant, 2022 · $64k
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To alleviate the causes of poverty by supporting oklahoma's community action agencies, which includes providing coordinated services, training and other assitance to member agencies.
Caasnm is a 60 year-old new mexico statewide health and social services not for profit with a mission of uplifting low-income families by connecting communities, encouraging family wellness, empowering families, and bridging resources.
Community assistance
Alleviating the causes and conditions of poverty in a ten county area of Southwest Missouri.
Agency provides community assistance to low income families and individuals including assistance with utility bills, home weatherization, emergency housing
Our mission is to reduce the causes and adverse consequences of poverty and to empower low-income individuals, families and communities to achieve self-sufficiency through advocacy, resource utilization and service delivery.
To aid low income families with early education, energy assistance, nutrition help and other services.
To assist individuals at or below the poverty line by providing resources, funding, and education.
Nonprofit corporation engaged in the administration and implementation of several area social programs with the purpose of providing social care and coordinating anti-poverty activity.
To partner with the community to eliminate poverty and create social change through advocacy and essential services.
The community action agency of talladega, clay, randolph, calhoun, and cleburne counties is committed to reducing and/or eliminating the causes and consequences of poverty for families and communities through comprehensive educational and…
To improve the economic security and well-being of low-income residents of Butte County and our surrounding service area through diverse housing, human service programs and community collaborations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Development Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Association of Community Action Par. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARKANSAS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES ASSOC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION PAR ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES INC ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Association of Community Partners ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF OKLAHOMA CITY & OKLAHOMA/CANADIAN COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds KI BOIS COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds INCA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION GROU ↗
- Who funds GREAT PLAINS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lift Community Action Agency Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oklahoma Association of Community Action funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties — 72% of income from government
- United Community Action Program Inc — 62% of income from government
- Lift Community Action Agency Inc — 43% of income from government
- Northeast Oklahoma Community Action Agency Inc — 38% of income from government
- Southwest Oklahoma Community Action Grou — 38% of income from government
- Inca Community Services Inc — 34% of income from government
- Community Action Development Corporation — 22% of income from government
- Ki Bois Community Action Foundation — 10% of income from government
- Opportunities Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.