Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ohio Jewelers Education Foundation

To provide scholarships, grants and other educational opportunities to employees of jewelers who are members of the ohio jewelers association and to hold educational seminars for those in the industry.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$98kArts & Culture$6kCommunity Improvement$4k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$3,510
Median grant
6
States reached
$764k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$17,067
RJO INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY$3,510
DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL$2,700
NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS$2,492
Individual grant recipient$957
GLENDO LLC$228
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OTTO FREI: $957 → 10%GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $17k → 11%JEWELERS OF AMERICA: $4k → 17%RJO INC: $10k → 9%GRS: $2k → 16%NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $19k → 4%CHRISTIAN DECAMILLIS ENGRAVING: $5k → 10%DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL: $3k → 15%AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY: $4k → 13%GEMVISION: $2k → 17%GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $9k → 11%JEWELERS OF AMERICA: $2k → 17%GLENDO LLC: $228 → 16%NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $7k → 4%ALLAN VERCELLINO: $5k → 10%DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL: $3k → 15%AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY: $695 → 13%GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5k → 11%NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $5k → 4%DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL: $2k → 15%GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $864 → 11%NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $2k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
IA
OH
CA
KS
TN
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 5 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$83k
$9k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $33k
  • GI
    GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue -23%
  • DN
    DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $8k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • G
    GRS
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • G
    GEMVISION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $33,385 · OtherNEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERSRJO INC: $10,000 · OtherRJO INCDROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL: $7,575 · OtherDROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOLJEWELERS OF AMERICA INC: $5,765 · OtherJEWELERS OF AMERICA INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+4 more: $4,975 · Other+4 moreGEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $31,571 · EducationGEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA …AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY: $4,205 · Community Improvement
Other$71,700Education$31,571Community Improvement$4,205

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $31,571 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWELERS OF AMERICA INC: $5,765 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN GEM SOCIETY: $4,205 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWELERS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ohio Jewelers Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ohio Jewelers Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ohio Jewelers Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph