Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ohio Jewelers Education Foundation

To provide scholarships, grants and other educational opportunities to employees of jewelers who are members of the ohio jewelers association and to hold educational seminars for those in the industry.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Education$98kArts & Culture$6kCommunity Improvement$4k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$3,510
Median grant
6
States reached
$764k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$17,067
RJO INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY$3,510
DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL$2,700
NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS$2,492
Individual grant recipient$957
GLENDO LLC$228
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OTTO FREI: $957 → 10%GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $17k → 11%JEWELERS OF AMERICA: $4k → 17%RJO INC: $10k → 9%GRS: $2k → 16%NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $19k → 4%CHRISTIAN DECAMILLIS ENGRAVING: $5k → 10%DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL: $3k → 15%AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY: $4k → 13%GEMVISION: $2k → 17%GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $9k → 11%JEWELERS OF AMERICA: $2k → 17%GLENDO LLC: $228 → 16%NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $7k → 4%ALLAN VERCELLINO: $5k → 10%DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL: $3k → 15%AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY: $695 → 13%GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5k → 11%NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $5k → 4%DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL: $2k → 15%GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $864 → 11%NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS: $2k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
IA
OH
CA
KS
TN
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$83k · 5 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$83k
$9k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $33k
  • GI
    GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue -23%
  • DN
    DROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $8k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • G
    GRS
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • G
    GEMVISION
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
0/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERS — $33,385 · OtherNEW APPROACH SCHOOL FOR JEWELERSRJO INC — $10,000 · OtherRJO INCDROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOL — $7,575 · OtherDROUHARD NATIONAL JEWELERS SCHOOLJEWELERS OF AMERICA INC — $5,765 · OtherJEWELERS OF AMERICA INCIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+4 more — $4,975 · Other+4 moreGEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC — $31,571 · EducationGEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA …AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY — $4,205 · Community Improvement
Other$71,700Education$31,571Community Improvement$4,205

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC — $31,571 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWELERS OF AMERICA INC — $5,765 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN GEM SOCIETY — $4,205 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds JEWELERS OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN GEM SOCIETY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ohio Jewelers Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph