Skip to content
Ohio Assoc Cnty Behavioral Hlth Auth Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ohio Assoc Cnty Behavioral Hlth Auth Foundation

The ohio association of county behavioral health authorities foundation is a provider of educational and advocacy programs for quality, cost-effective prevention and treatment for behavioral health services.

$313k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Civil Rights$427kHealth$235kCommunity Improvement$137kCrime & Legal$18kArts & Culture$17kPublic Benefit$5k
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 35 grants below total $272,387, the rows itemized in this filing. The $313,385 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,998 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $226k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $47k
$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAINT VALLEY ADAMH BOARD$12,500
CUYAHOGA COUNTY ADAMH BOARD$12,300
MHRS BD SENECA OTTAWA SANDUSKY WYND$11,000
FOUR COUNTY ADAMHS BOARD$10,800
MIAMI DARKE & SHELBY MHRS BOARD$9,500
GEUAGA COUNTY MHRS BOARD$9,500
BELMONT HARRISON & MONROE ADAMH BD$9,500
ADAMS LAWRENCE & SCIOTO ADAMH BOARD$9,500
GALLIA JACKSON & MEIGS MHRS BOARD$9,500
TUSCARAWS & CARROLL ADAMH BOARD$9,500
MUSKINGUM AREA ADAMH BOARD$9,000
MERCER VAN WERT & PAULDING ADAMH$8,931
CRAWFORD & MARION ADAMH BOARD$8,000
WARREN & CLINTON ADAMH BOARD$8,000
WAYNE & HOLMES COUNTY MHRS BOARD$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 51% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%DELAWARE MORROW MHRS BOARD: $78k → 5%UNION COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $17k → 5%WARREN & CLINTON ADAMH BOARD: $8k → 6%GEUAGA COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $10k → 6%PUTNAM COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $7k → 7%FOUR COUNTY ADAMHS BOARD: $11k → 8%HANCOCK COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $59k → 9%FAIRFIELD COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $7k → 9%LAKE COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $7k → 9%CLERMONT COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $7k → 9%MERCER VAN WERT & PAULDING ADAMH: $9k → 9%MIAMI DARKE SHELBY MHRS BOARD: $47k → 10%WAYNE & HOLMES COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $8k → 10%PREBLE COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $14k → 11%TUSCARAWS & CARROLL ADAMH BOARD: $10k → 12%MHRS BD SENECA OTTAWA SANDUSKY WYND: $11k → 12%WOOD COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $7k → 12%PORTAGE COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $7k → 12%LORAIN COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $7k → 13%LOGAN & CHAMPAIGN MHRS BOARD: $40k → 13%HURON COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $7k → 13%MUSKINGUM AREA ADAMH BOARD: $38k → 14%PAINT VALLEY ADAMH BOARD: $40k → 14%CLARK GREENE & MADISON MHRS BOARD: $43k → 15%ADAMH BOARD OF FRANKLIN COUNTY: $20k → 15%CRAWFORD & MARION ADAMH BOARD: $8k → 15%COLUMBIANA COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $8k → 16%HAMILTON COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $7k → 16%TRUMBULL COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $7k → 16%BROWN COUNTY MH AS BOARD: $16k → 16%ADAMH BOARD OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY: $37k → 17%BELMONT HARRISON & MONROE ADAMH BD: $10k → 17%JEFFERSON COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $7k → 19%MAHONING COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $7k → 19%GALLIA JACKSON & MEIGS MHRS BOARD: $10k → 20%ADAMS LAWRENCE & SCIOTO ADAMH BOARD: $10k → 22%UNION COUNTY MHRS BOARD: $7k → 5%FOUR COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $9k → 8%HANCOCK COUNTY ADMAH BOARD: $7k → 9%MIAMI DARKE & SHELBY MHRS BOARD: $10k → 10%LOGAN & CHAMPAIGN MHRS BOARD: $8k → 13%MUSKINGUM AREA ADAMH BOARD: $9k → 14%PAINT VALLEY ADAMH BOARD: $13k → 14%CUYAHOGA COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $12k → 17%GALLIA JACKSON MEIGS MHRS BOARD: $7k → 20%ADAMS LAWRENCE SCIOTO MHRS BOARD: $7k → 22%MUSKINGUM AREA ADAMH BOARD: $9k → 14%PAINT VALLEY ADAMH BOARD: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$486k · 16 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$486k
$215k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HANCOCK COUNTY ADAMH BOARD
    2× · 2023–2025 · $66k
  • PV
    PAINT VALLEY ADAMH BOARD
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k
  • MA
    MUSKINGUM AREA ADAMH BOARD
    3× · 2023–2025 · $56k

Funded once

  • DM
    DELAWARE MORROW MHRS BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · $78k
  • MD
    MIAMI DARKE SHELBY MHRS BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · $52k
  • CG
    CLARK GREENE & MADISON MHRS BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · $43k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2022–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2022 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DELAWARE MORROW MHRS BOARD: $78,000 · OtherDELAWARE MORROW MHRS BOARDHANCOCK COUNTY ADAMH BOARD: $65,620 · OtherHANCOCK COUNTY ADAMH BOARDPAINT VALLEY ADAMH BOARD: $60,250 · OtherPAINT VALLEY ADAMH BOARDMUSKINGUM AREA ADAMH BOARD: $56,300 · OtherMUSKINGUM AREA ADAMH BOARDMIAMI DARKE SHELBY MHRS BOARD: $52,200 · OtherMIAMI DARKE SHELBY MHRS BOARDADAMH BOARD OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY: $49,755 · OtherADAMH BOARD OF CUYAHOGA COUNTYLOGAN & CHAMPAIGN MHRS BOARD: $48,000 · OtherLOGAN & CHAMPAIGN MHRS BOARDCLARK GREENE & MADISON MHRS BOARD: $42,500 · Other+36 more: $387,429 · Other+36 more
Other$840,054

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Center for Technology…Oneohio Recovery Foun…Dave Thomas Foundatio…Ohio Child Care Resou…
Center for Technology and Civic LifeIL27.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Technology and Civic Life · Oneohio Recovery Foundation Inc · Dave Thomas Foundation for Adoption · Ohio Child Care Resource and Referral Association

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ohio Assoc Cnty Behavioral Hlth Auth Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ohio Assoc Cnty Behavioral Hlth Auth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ohio Assoc Cnty Behavioral Hlth Auth’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home