· Private foundation
Ohel Naftoly
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k54 grants · $128k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $272k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $298k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bnos Square of Williamsburg | $1,001,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $87,000 |
| Yeshiva & Mesivta Arugath Habosem | $58,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $52,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| Eisek Hatorah D'Rachmistrivka | $50,000 |
| EMET VESHALOM | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,500 |
| Cong Rachmistrivka | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,560 |
| Cong Chasidei Bobov | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $17,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,500 |
| Ohr Chodosh | $12,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
56 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- EVEMET VESHALOM INC5× · 2020–2024 · $275k
- CBCHERNOBIL BUIDING FUND4× · 2020–2023 · $216k
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2020–2024 · $203k
Funded once
- KBKHAL BOYAN OF MONSEYone grant, 2023 · $22k
- BYBINYAN YERUSHLAIMone grant, 2023 · $20k
- CLCHESED LAVRAHAMone grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
Support jewry in Israel
To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
Assistance to the indigent
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Ani Mamin Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Blum Foundation · The Margareten Family Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · The Pillars Trust · U&R Foundation · R' Shaya Ben Moshe Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ohel Naftoly funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ohel Naftoly. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Ohel Naftoly’s filings →