Skip to content

· Public charity

Oak Tree Family Fund

Oaktree will continue to support the 3east program at mclean hospital.

$293k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$145kPhilanthropy$46kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$25kEnvironment$20kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $234,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $293,266 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $58,566 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $229k
$12,700
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LCH HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OF KENNETT SQUARE PA$40,000
DBT WORKS$30,000
SARGENT FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND$26,000
RANGELEY HERITAGE TRUST$25,000
FRIENDS OF THE RIVER VALLEY$25,000
BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND FOR CHILDREN$20,000
RANGELEY HEALTH AND WELLNESS$12,700
KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION$10,000
MUSICIANS ON CALL$10,000
MOOSELOOKMEGUNTIC IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LCH HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES OF KENNETT SQUARE PA: $40k → 6%KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 6%KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$191k · 6 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$191k
$12k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SARGENT FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $46k
  • RH
    RANGELEY HERITAGE TRUST
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k
  • DW
    DBT WORKS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RANGELEY HERITAGE TRUST: $45,000 · OtherRANGELEY HERITAGE TRUSTDBT WORKS: $40,000 · OtherDBT WORKSFRIENDS OF THE RIVER VALLEY: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE RIVER VALLEYRANGELEY HEALTH AND WELLNESS: $12,700 · OtherRANGELEY HEALTH AND WELLNESSMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $12,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMOOSELOOKMEGUNTIC IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · OtherLCH Health and Community Services: $40,000 · Human ServicesLCH Health and Commu…KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE: $20,000 · Human ServicesKENNETT AREA COMMUNI…SARGENT FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND: $46,000 · PhilanthropySARGENT FAMILY …LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthMUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureBETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND FOR CH: $20,000 · Education
Other$160,700Human Services$60,000Philanthropy$46,000Health$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARGENT FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND: $46,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetLCH Health and Community Services: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICIANS ON CALL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARGENT FAMILY COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds LCH Health and Community Services ↗
  • Who funds LAHEY CLINIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSICIANS ON CALL INC ↗
  • Who funds KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND FOR CH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oak Tree Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oak Tree Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oak Tree Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph