Skip to content
O'Dell Women's Center Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

O'Dell Women's Center Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$273k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Youth Development$175kPhilanthropy$87kHuman Services$30kFood & Nutrition$25kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $156k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$757k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY PIONEER VALLEY$55,608
DRESS FOR SUCCESS WESTERN MA$50,000
SOUTH END COMMUNITY CENTER$50,000
PARENT VILLAGES$30,000
HOPE FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES$30,000
GIRLS INC OF THE VALLEY$30,000
THE GRAY HOUSE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$9,400
SPRINGFIELD PUERTO RICAN PARADE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%HOPE FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $30k → 17%UNITED WAY PIONEER VALLEY: $56k → 17%PARENT VILLAGES: $30k → 17%SOUTH END COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Springfield Family Center Inc

The springfield family center is a community-based charitable food organization dedicated to providing resources to our food insecure neighbors in the greater springfield area.

—
2
Family Violence Prevention Services Inc

To break the cycle of family violence and to strengthen families by providing the necessary tools for self-sufficiency through the delivery of emergency shelter, transitional housing, education, effective parenting, and early intervention…

Human Services
3
Springfield Partners for Community Action Inc

To utilize and provide resources that assist people in need, to obtain economic stability, ulimately creating a better way of life. the organization provides services to the residents of the greater springfield area.

Education
4
Family Independence Inc

Family independence, inc. will provide group home living for teen mothers and their children who are receiving public assistance and are unable to live with their families or the children's fathers due to abuse, neglect, substance abuse or…

Human Services
5
Springfield Supported Housing Program

Springfield supported housing program is to be a person centered program providing resources towards safe, stable, and affordable housing options while collaborating with community partners on all aspects of housing instability.

Housing & Shelter
6
Ymca of Greater Springfield Inc

To serve the human needs in greater Springfield Massachusetts area by providing programs that promote lifelong personal growth and the balanced development of spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
7
Wayside Youth and Family Support Network Inc

Empowering children, young adults and families to achieve greater independence and emotional well-being.

Human Services
8
Springfield Area Parent Child Center

Building bridges of support for children, families, and caregivers. the organization is a member of the vermont parent child center network, and serves southern windsor and northern windham counties. sapcc builds bridges of support for…

Human Services
9
Family and Youth Initiative Inc

Family & Youth Initiative creates a supportive community and lasting relationships for teens and young adults who are in or have aged out of foster care. We believe that every child deserves family and are committed to increasing the…

Human Services
10
Springfield Pride Parade

At the Springfield Pride Parade, we walk together in a community-driven movement of support, inclusivity, and public recognition to remind our LGBTQ+ youth that they are safe, they are loved, and they are not alone.

Youth Development
11
Springfield Empowerment Zone Partnership Inc

Springfield empowerment zone partnership is a ground-breaking initiative to empower the students, families, and educators of springfield, massachusetts with a commitment to access, belonging and opportunity.

Education
12
The Springfield Project

The mission of the springfield project is to unite springfield as a community by working to improve the quality of life in our neighborhoods. the project seeks to empower citizens to develop solutions to problems that they identify in…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Pioneer Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Springfield Puerto Rican Parade Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC: $55,608 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INCSouth End Community Center of Spfld Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesSouth End Community Center of Spfld IncPARENT VILLAGES INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesPARENT VILLAGES INCHOPE FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INCDRESS FOR SUCCESS WESTERN MA: $65,000 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESS WESTERN MAThe Gray House Inc: $15,000 · OtherThe Gray House IncRACHEL'S TABLE CO JODI FALK: $10,000 · OtherRACHEL'S TABLE CO JODI FALKIndividual grant recipient: $9,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+1 more: $750 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $31,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY I…GIRLS INC OF THE VALLEY: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INC …THE SPRINGFIELD PUERTO RICAN PARADE INC: $2,500 · Education
Human Services$165,608Other$100,150Community Improvement$31,000Youth Development$30,000Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC: $55,608 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSouth End Community Center of Spfld Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $31,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARENT VILLAGES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetGIRLS INC OF THE VALLEY: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetThe Gray House Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE SPRINGFIELD PUERTO RICAN PARADE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Beveridge Family …Community Foundation …The Irene E and Georg…Berkshire Bank Founda…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Beveridge Family FoundationMA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Beveridge Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · The Irene E and George A Davis Foundation · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization O'Dell Women's Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from O'Dell Women's Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Parent Villages Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Valley: 30% of income from government
  • United Way of Pioneer Valley Inc: 10% of income from government
  • South End Community Center of Spfld Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on O'Dell Women's Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home