· Public charity
Nuclear Power Labor Management Cooperation Committee Trust
The trust will explore ways to increase productivity, develop innovative skills-upgrading programs, recruit new workers for the construction and operation of nuclear facilities, and develop other special programs for the benefit of the nuclear industry and its workforce.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRADESFUTURES | $500,000 |
| BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT | $200,000 |
| NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| NCCMP | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT AFL-CIO4× · 2022–2025 · $650k · revenue +19%
- MTMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $130k · revenue +21%
- NENUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE INC2× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- TTRADESFUTURESgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $800k · revenue +57% · 30% of their budget
- BCBURKE COUNTY COMMITTEE OF 100 INCone grant, 2022 · $125k
- GHGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INCone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The national maintenance agreements policy committee negotiates and administers the national maintenance agreements, a series of collective bargaining agreements utilized by more than 1,700 industrial contractors who employ members of…
The organization is a trade union that represents operating engineers, who work as heavy equipment operators, mechanics,and surveyors in the construction industry, and stationary engineers, who work in operations and maintenance in…
The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…
Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…
Representation of u.s. epa bargaining unit employees.
The north american electric reliability corporation (nerc) is a not-for-profit international regulatory authority whose mission is to assure the effective and efficient reduction of risks to the reliability and security of the grid.
Iuoe is a trade union who represents operating engineers and is dedicated to the common interests of its members by ensuring protections of prevailing wages on public projects and alleviating healthcare costs through coalition building.…
To provide accident, hospital, medical, surgical, dental, prescription, vision, disability, employee assistance, and death benefits for eligible participants as agreed upon by the national electrical contractors association - washington,…
The fund was established to improve labor-mangement relationships and to achieve better working conditions for employees, a more qualified and satisfied workforce and to maximize job security.
To promote, protect and uphold the common interests of the electrical contracting industry.
The nccmp is the only national organization devoted exclusively to protecting the interests of the unions and the job-creating employers of america that jointly sponsor multiemployer retirement and welfare plans and the more than 20…
Labor union representing the electrical worker force
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nccmp Research and Education Corporation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Horton's Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TVA PROJECT LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE TRUST ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT ↗
- Who funds TRADESFUTURES ↗
- Who funds BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BURKE COUNTY COMMITTEE OF 100 INC ↗
- Who funds NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds NCCMP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BURKE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS L U #1579 ↗
- Who funds Healing Emergency Aid Response Team 911 ↗
- Who funds North American Young Generation in Nuclear Inc ↗
- Who funds HORTON'S KIDS INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nuclear Power Labor Management Cooperation Committee Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.