· Private foundation
Nubren Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $142k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Viznitz Beit Shemesh, Cong | $100,000 |
| Spring Valley, Yeshiva of | $40,000 |
| Toldos Yaakov Yosef of Lakew | $30,000 |
| Neve College for women, Frie | $17,000 |
| Sons of Israel, Cong | $12,500 |
| Ohr Avrohom Chaim, Yeshiva | $12,000 |
| Kupath Chaya Rivka Rochel | $10,500 |
| Bais Yaakov Aderes Miriam | $10,325 |
| Greator Monsey, Yeshiva of | $10,000 |
| Tiferes Yiseoel Chaim, Yeshiva | $5,800 |
| Bais Yaakov of Lakewood | $4,000 |
| The Shul of Bal Harbor | $2,036 |
| Beth Pinchas, Cong | $2,000 |
| Agudath Israel of America | $1,800 |
| Gates of Mercy, Cong | $1,250 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
54 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- LCLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC4× · 2017–2021 · $30k · revenue +48%
- MIMAYSHARIM INC2× · 2017–2019 · $24k · revenue +139%
- ELEDIBLE LEFTOVERS INC6× · 2017–2023 · $1k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- ACAZA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $28k · revenue ×15
- BSBnei Sholom Zalman, Congone grant, 2019 · $20k
- NCNeve College for Women, Fiends ofone grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.
Charitable work to help people in need
Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
How this is measured
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 217 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Grove Foundation · The Eisner Charitable Foundation Inc · The Tzedaka Fund · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · The Tzedakah Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Nubren Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nubren Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Nubren’s filings →