Skip to content
Nsbr Facilities Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Nsbr Facilities Inc

Nsbr launched NSBR FACILITIES INC.

$280k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Education$1.2M
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $215k
$43,455
Median grant
3
States reached
$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERS$215,000
GEO PROPERTIES FOUNDATION INC$43,455
HELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRIENDS OF BASIS LOUISIANA: $35k → 11%GEO PROPERTIES FOUNDATION INC: $308k → 8%NEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERS: $215k → 16%IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $126k → 27%IDEA UNIVERSITY PREP: $300k → 19%GEO PROPERTIES FOUNDATION INC: $43k → 8%NSBR-F BON CARRE: $106k → 19%NSBR-F GARDERE: $36k → 19%HELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $17k → 19%FOUNDATION FOR EAST BATON ROUGE SCHOOLS: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idea Public Schools of Nola Inc

Idea public schools prepares students from primarily undeserved communities for success in college and citizenship by providing educational services to students in grade k (kindergarten) through grade 12 (twelve).

Education
2
Idea Public Schools Arkansas Inc

IDEA Arkansas was established to provide tuition-free education to college-bound students in Arkansas.

Education
3
Bbr Schools Inc

The mission of BBR Schools is to empower students to achieve at globally competitive levels with a transformative K-12 academic programs.

Education
4
Kipp of New Orleans Inc

Kipp new orleans helps our students, their families, and our city build a brighter future by building academic powerhouses filled with caring and talented educators who unleash unlimited opportunities for students so that they are prepared…

Education
5
Louisiana Charter School Alliance

The mission of GNOCCS is to strengthen and support charter schools across Greater New Orleans by fostering collaboration, building capacity, and advocating for policies that enhance student achievement. Its most significant activities…

Education
6
New Schools Georgia Inc

develop public charter schools

Education
7
Exalt Academy of Southwest Little Rock

Exalt Academy of Southwest Little Rock prepares students from educationally under-served areas of Southwest Little Rock for competitive colleges and advanced careers from an early age by ensuring mastery of the core subjects and developing…

Education
8
The Einstein Group Inc

To nurture students to be academically strong, as well as socially and emotionally resilient.

Education
9
South Louisiana Charter Academy Foundation Inc

This nonprofit corporation is organized & shall be operated exclusively for the following purposes:improve pupil learning &, in general, the public school system; increase learning opportunities & access to quality education for pupils;…

Education
10
Lafayette Charter Foundation Inc

To provide an inspiring and motivatng educational environment that delivers real, measurable results and prepares our students to be the next generation of leaders.

Education
11
Baton Rouge College Preparatory Inc

Baton rouge college preparatory charter school equips all students in grades five through twelve with the knowledge, skills, and character necessary to excel in college and in life.

—
12
Louisiana Charter Schools in Action

Educating and advocating for Charter Schools in Louisiana

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idea Public Schools Louisiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Louisiana Academy of Production. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEO Properties Foundation Inc: $350,991 · EducationGEO Properties Foundation IncIDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LOUISIANA INC: $300,000 · EducationIDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LOUISIANA INCNEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERS: $215,000 · EducationNEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERSIDEA Public Schools: $126,349 · EducationIDEA Public SchoolsNSBR-F BON CARRE: $106,118 · EducationNSBR-F BON CARREFoundation for East Baton Rouge School System: $50,000 · Education+3 more: $87,522 · Education+3 more
Education$1,235,980

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEO Properties Foundation Inc: $350,991 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetIDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LOUISIANA INC: $300,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERS: $215,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetIDEA Public Schools: $126,349 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNSBR-F BON CARRE: $106,118 over 1y, 37% of budgetNSBR-F GARDERE: $35,522 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $17,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

New Schools for Baton…
New Schools for Baton RougeLA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Schools for Baton Rouge

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nsbr Facilities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nsbr Facilities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $102k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nsbr Facilities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home