Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Nsbr Facilities Inc

Nsbr launched NSBR FACILITIES INC.

$280k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182023.

Education$1.2M
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $215k
$43,455
Median grant
3
States reached
$124k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERS$215,000
GEO PROPERTIES FOUNDATION INC$43,455
HELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$17,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRIENDS OF BASIS LOUISIANA: $35k → 11%GEO PROPERTIES FOUNDATION INC: $308k → 8%NEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERS: $215k → 16%IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $126k → 27%IDEA UNIVERSITY PREP: $300k → 19%GEO PROPERTIES FOUNDATION INC: $43k → 8%NSBR-F BON CARRE: $106k → 19%NSBR-F GARDERE: $36k → 19%HELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $17k → 19%FOUNDATION FOR EAST BATON ROUGE SCHOOLS: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idea Public Schools of Nola Inc

Idea public schools prepares students from primarily undeserved communities for success in college and citizenship by providing educational services to students in grade k (kindergarten) through grade 12 (twelve).

Education
2
Idea Public Schools Arkansas Inc

IDEA Arkansas was established to provide tuition-free education to college-bound students in Arkansas.

Education
3
Bbr Schools Inc

The mission of BBR Schools is to empower students to achieve at globally competitive levels with a transformative K-12 academic programs.

Education
4
Kipp of New Orleans Inc

Kipp new orleans helps our students, their families, and our city build a brighter future by building academic powerhouses filled with caring and talented educators who unleash unlimited opportunities for students so that they are prepared…

Education
5
New Schools Georgia Inc

develop public charter schools

Education
6
New Schools for Baton Rouge

New schools for baton rouge's mission is to transform schools citywide to ensure there is an excellent school for every child in our city. as a community partnership nsbr is bringing together talent and resources that deliver excellent…

Education
7
The Einstein Group Inc

To nurture students to be academically strong, as well as socially and emotionally resilient.

Education
8
New Orleans School Facility Finance Foundation Inc

To enter into agreements and to engage in financing arrangements for the planning, renovation, construction, leasing, subleasing, managing, and improving of public and/or charter schools and school property within the parish of new…

Education
9
Legacy Charter School Support Corporation

To support legacy charter school

10
South Louisiana Charter Academy Foundation Inc

This nonprofit corporation is organized & shall be operated exclusively for the following purposes:improve pupil learning &, in general, the public school system; increase learning opportunities & access to quality education for pupils;…

Education
11
Exalt Academy of Southwest Little Rock

Exalt Academy of Southwest Little Rock prepares students from educationally under-served areas of Southwest Little Rock for competitive colleges and advanced careers from an early age by ensuring mastery of the core subjects and developing…

Education
12
Nsbr Facilities Inc

Nsbr launched nsbr facilities inc. in order to support charter schools in building, accessing, financing, and leasing quality and affordable lease space. this often includes providing pre-development and diligence services to schools such…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idea Public Schools Louisiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nsbr-F Bon Carre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GEO Properties Foundation Inc — $350,991 · EducationGEO Properties Foundation IncIDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LOUISIANA INC — $300,000 · EducationIDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LOUISIANA INCNEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERS — $215,000 · EducationNEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERSIDEA Public Schools — $126,349 · EducationIDEA Public SchoolsNSBR-F BON CARRE — $106,118 · EducationNSBR-F BON CARREFoundation for East Baton Rouge School System — $50,000 · Education+3 more — $87,522 · Education+3 more
Education$1,235,980

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEO Properties Foundation Inc — $350,991 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetIDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS LOUISIANA INC — $300,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW SCHOOL FACILITY PARTNERS — $215,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetIDEA Public Schools — $126,349 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNSBR-F BON CARRE — $106,118 over 1y, 37% of budgetNSBR-F GARDERE — $35,522 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHELIX COMMUNITY SCHOOLS — $17,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

New Schools for Baton RougeLA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Schools for Baton Rouge

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nsbr Facilities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $93k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph