Skip to content
North Mississippi Health Services Inc at a glance

· Public charity

North Mississippi Health Services Inc

North mississippi health services (nmhs) is the parent company of a diversified regional health care organization, which serves 24 counties in north mississippi and northwest alabama from headquarters in tupelo, ms.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$561kHealth$175kArts & Culture$60kPhilanthropy$41kRecreation & Sports$33kCommunity Improvement$29kYouth Development$14k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $227,125, the rows itemized in this filing. The $243,525 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $180k
$21,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$145M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MS FOUNDATION$179,625
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$21,500
NORTH MS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%NORTH MS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MS FOUNDATION: $180k → 18%Old Waverly Golf Club: $10k → 22%NORTH MS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MS FOUNDATION: $83k → 18%North MS Symphony Orchestra: $10k → 14%University of MS Foundation: $83k → 18%North MS Symphony Orchestra: $10k → 14%University of MS Foundation: $83k → 18%North MS Symphony Orchestra: $10k → 14%University of MS Foundation: $62k → 18%North MS Symphony Orchestra: $10k → 14%University of MS Foundation: $62k → 18%North MS Symphony Orchestra: $10k → 14%University of MS Foundation: $62k → 18%Yocona Area Council: $8k → 14%University of MS Foundation: $62k → 18%Fourth of July Celebration Association: $8k → 14%University of MS Foundation: $62k → 18%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 6 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+40%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $741k · revenue +57%
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERV INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $175k · revenue +34%
  • CD
    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • OW
    OLD WAVERLY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +138%
  • DT
    DOWNTOWN TUPELOMAIN STREET ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trans-Mississippi Golf Association

To promote the true spirit of amateur golf and encourage and cultivate spirit of fellowship and friendly competition among members of the association.

—
2
Tishomingo County Development Foundation

To promote economic and community development within tishomingo county, mississippi.

—
3
Yazoo Library Association

The Yazoo Library Association Provides Public Library Services to the Citizens of Yazoo County, Mississippi

Education
4
Mississippi School of the Arts Foundation Inc

The organization's purpose is to exclusively benefit, directly or indirectly, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of the Mississippi School of the Arts.

Education
5
Tutwiler Clinc Inc

The Clinic is a rural health clinic located in Tutwiler, Mississippi. It provides medical, dental, and optometry services to the surrounding area. Ancillary health education and good health practices are promoted.

—
6
North Missindustrial Development a

Promoting northeast mississippi for industrial growth.

—
7
Montessori School of Tupelo Inc

Montessori school of tupelo, ms, inc. is built upon the principles of montessori philosophy, fostering independence, academic excellence and a lifelong love of learning. the school is open to children of all backgrounds and desires as much…

Education
8
Tupelo School District Learning Foundation

The organization primary purpose is to enhance the quality of education in the Tupelo Public School District

Education
9
Mississippi Golf Association Inc

To promote and conserve the best interest and true spirit of the game of golf in mississippi.

Recreation & Sports
10
Simpson County Dev Foundation Inc

Contribute to the pursuit of economic and community development in simpson county, ms and surrounding area.

—
11
Economic Development Center of Washington County Inc

To promote and assist in economic development, job creation and job training for washington county, ms and surrounding areas. to promote and assist existing businesses in the area.

Community Improvement
12
Trans-Mississippi Turf Scholarship

To promote the study of horticulture and agronomy as it pertains to golf course management.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tupelo Youth Sports Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Old Waverly Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $740,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATIONGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERV INC: $175,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN HE…TUPELO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $44,650 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL: $7,500 · OtherDOWNTOWN TUPELOMAIN STREET ASSOCIATION: $5,500 · OtherCREATE FOUNDATION: $41,000 · PhilanthropyTUPELO YOUTH SPORTS COUNCIL INC: $22,500 · Recreation & SportsOLD WAVERLY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI INC: $12,000 · Youth Development
Education$740,500Health$175,000Arts & Culture$80,000Other$57,650Philanthropy$41,000Recreation & Sports$32,500Youth Development$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $740,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERV INC: $175,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetTUPELO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC: $80,000 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $44,650 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCREATE FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTUPELO YOUTH SPORTS COUNCIL INC: $22,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOLD WAVERLY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDOWNTOWN TUPELOMAIN STREET ASSOCIATION: $5,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Brevard Family Founda…E Rhodes and Leona B …
Brevard Family FoundationMS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Brevard Family Foundation · E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North Mississippi Health Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Mississippi Health Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on North Mississippi Health Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home