· Public charity
North Mississippi Health Services Inc
North mississippi health services (nmhs) is the parent company of a diversified regional health care organization, which serves 24 counties in north mississippi and northwest alabama from headquarters in tupelo, ms.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $111,125 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $139,175 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,050 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF MS FOUNDATION | $83,125 |
| COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION | $18,000 |
| NORTH MS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $561k · revenue +57%
- GSGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERV INC6× · 2017–2023 · $175k · revenue +34%
- CDCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- OWOLD WAVERLY FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +40%
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCILgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +77%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Clinic is a rural health clinic located in Tutwiler, Mississippi. It provides medical, dental, and optometry services to the surrounding area. Ancillary health education and good health practices are promoted.
To promote the true spirit of amateur golf and encourage and cultivate spirit of fellowship and friendly competition among members of the association.
To promote economic and community development within tishomingo county, mississippi.
Montessori school of tupelo, ms, inc. is built upon the principles of montessori philosophy, fostering independence, academic excellence and a lifelong love of learning. the school is open to children of all backgrounds and desires as much…
The organization's purpose is to exclusively benefit, directly or indirectly, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of the Mississippi School of the Arts.
The Yazoo Library Association Provides Public Library Services to the Citizens of Yazoo County, Mississippi
Promoting northeast mississippi for industrial growth.
To promote and conserve the best interest and true spirit of the game of golf in mississippi.
Contribute to the pursuit of economic and community development in simpson county, ms and surrounding area.
To promote the study of horticulture and agronomy as it pertains to golf course management.
To promote the welfare of architects in the State of Tennessee
To promote industry and commerce in the tullahoma area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tupelo Youth Sports Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Old Waverly Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERV INC ↗
- Who funds TUPELO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC ↗
- Who funds CREATE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TUPELO YOUTH SPORTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds OLD WAVERLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH MISSISSIPPI INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN TUPELOMAIN STREET ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Brevard Family Foundation · E Rhodes and Leona B Carpenter Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization North Mississippi Health Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.