Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

California · Public charity

North Lake Tahoe Resort Association

To promote tourism and benefit businesses through efforts that enhance the economic, environmental, recreational and cultural climate of the area.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$304k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$71,335
Largest grant, FY2024
$84,605
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$9.0M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Truckee North Tahoe Transportation Management Association$84,60516%
Eco-Clean Solutions$79,7001n/a
Crisis Intervention Services Dba Sierra Community House$38,19011%
Range of Light Medical Group$30,0001n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($71k), not named here.

Compare North Lake Tahoe Resort Association with peer funders

About North Lake Tahoe Resort Association

How much does North Lake Tahoe Resort Association give?
North Lake Tahoe Resort Association reported 5 itemized grants totaling $303,830, out of $1,101,210 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does North Lake Tahoe Resort Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Employment (28%), Environment (26%), Community Improvement (23%).
Who are North Lake Tahoe Resort Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: Truckee North Tahoe Transportation Management Association ($85k), Eco-Clean Solutions ($80k), Crisis Intervention Services Dba Sierra Community House ($38k).
Where is North Lake Tahoe Resort Association based?
North Lake Tahoe Resort Association is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on North Lake Tahoe Resort Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home