· Public charity
North East Islamic Community Center Inc
To provide accomodations to muslim students, both american and international, for all levels of religious education, and provide scholarship to muslim students, both american and international, who apply with two reference letters and transcripts.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $20,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $22,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,900 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BROOKLYN AMITY SCHOOL | $11,300 |
| TURKISH CULTURAL CENTER LONG ISLAND | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABROOKLYN AMITY SCHOOL3× · 2020–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +39% · 39% of their budget
- TJTHE JOURNALISTS AND WRITERS FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $55k · revenue +14%
- WIWISDOM ISLAMIC STUDIES AND EDUCATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $43k · revenue ×14 · 53% of their budget
Funded once
- CECOMPASS EDUCATION AND CAREER FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $26k · revenue +280%
- AFALTRUISM FOR NEW YORK FOUNDATIONINCone grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue -4%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $14k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education
An educational organization providing premier educational services to those who cannot afford it, as well as general charitable services
To provide religious and educational studies
To foster critical thinking in the context of Islam
Education services
Turkic Foundation of Brooklyn is a non-political, non-governmental, not-for-profit civic entity that was established in 2022 by Turkic Americans that want to promote a strong Turkic American friendship with the hopes that it would promote…
Provide religious education, space and mentorship.
Religious culture and education, meditation and religions comparative study
Religious School With Mosque
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates of Silenced Turkey Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BROOKLYN AMITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Turkish Cultural Center ↗
- Who funds THE JOURNALISTS AND WRITERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WISDOM ISLAMIC STUDIES AND EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS EDUCATION AND CAREER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALTRUISM FOR NEW YORK FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES OF SILENCED TURKEY INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN GENERATION WORSHIP AND RETRE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization North East Islamic Community Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to North East Islamic Community Center Inc?
Find your warmest path to North East Islamic Community Center Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.