Skip to content

· Public charity

North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation Corp

The NORTH DAKOTA RURAL REHABILITATION CORPoration is a charitable non-profit, charitable corporation committed to providing low interest loans and grant to qualifying north dakota farmers, ranchers, cooperatives, non-profit and public entities, the primary purpose of which is to assist in the development, rehabilitation and enhancement…

$872k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$473k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.2MCommunity Improvement$1.0MEducation$927kPhilanthropy$360kYouth Development$116kEnvironment$92kScience & Tech$25kHealth$15k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $778,451, the rows itemized in this filing. The $871,545 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $93,094 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $473k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$100M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP$472,551
ND STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION$200,000
FARM RESCUE$50,000
ND FARMERS MARKET AND GROWERS ASSOCIATION$40,000
NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION$15,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $22k → 8%CARRINGTON RESEARCH EXTENSION CENTER: $25k → 9%ND FARMERS MARKET AND GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $42k → 10%ND STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $634k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $50k → 11%NDSU FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $625k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $21k → 8%CARRINGTON RESEARCH EXTENSION CENTER: $25k → 9%ND FARMERS MARKET AND GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $40k → 10%ND STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $473k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $35k → 11%NDSU FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $300k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $20k → 8%ND FARMERS MARKET AND GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $40k → 10%ND STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $459k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $25k → 11%NDSU FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $18k → 8%ND FARMERS MARKET AND GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $40k → 10%ND STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $452k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $25k → 11%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $17k → 8%NORTH DAKOTA FARMERS MARKET AND GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $40k → 10%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $148k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $25k → 11%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $16k → 8%NORTH DAKOTA FARMERS MARKET AND GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $40k → 10%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $121k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $25k → 11%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $13k → 8%ND FARMERS MARKET AND GROWERS ASSOCIATION: $40k → 10%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $113k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $25k → 11%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $13k → 8%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $63k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $25k → 11%NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOL PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 8%ND ASSOCIATION OF RURAL ELECTRIC COOP: $24k → 10%FARM RESCUE: $25k → 11%FARRM - FOUNDATION OF AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SUSTAINAB: $48k → 11%FARRM - FOUNDATION OF AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SUSTAINAB: $44k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation Corp’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in ND; by stated purpose, 70%.

North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation Corplessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$4.7M
$0

Still filing today

82%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +69%
  • ND
    North Dakota State University Foundation
    3× · 2018–2020 · $927k · revenue +78%
  • ND
    NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $360k · revenue ×23

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
    —
    2
    North Dakota Rural Health Association

    Info & advocacy for rural health in nd

    Health
    3
    North Dakota Stockmen's Association

    The nd stockmen's association is a cattle producers' trade organization. it provides member services & activities, conducts the state's brand programs, & provides legislative watchdog activities. its mission is to unite, protect, promote,…

    —
    4
    North Dakota Farmers Union Educational Foundation

    The purpose of nd farmers educational foundation is to support the north dakota farmers union foundation.

    Food & Nutrition
    5
    North Dakota Masonic Foundation
    —
    6
    Nd Natural Resources Conservation Trust

    To promote the conservation of natural resources in the state of north dakota

    Environment
    7
    North Dakota Farm Bureau Foundation

    To increase the quality of life for ranchers and farmers in ND. To provide education and assistance to increase the knowledge level of issues facing farmers and ranchers in North Dakota and elsewhere.

    Education
    8
    North Dakota Ffa Foundation Incorporated

    The nd ffa foundation's mission is to support leadership opportunites and activities of the nd ffa and agricultural education.

    Youth Development
    9
    North Dakota Public Information Officer Association
    Education
    10
    Future Farmers of America Association North Dakota

    Promotion of agricultural activities for high school students

    —
    11
    North Dakota Private Grazing Lands Coalition

    The ndglc is a non-profit organization that believes through voluntary actions, respect for private property rights, and providing education on the values and multiple benefits of well managed grazing resources, the goals of promoting the…

    Environment
    12
    North Dakota Soybean Growers Association

    Support Policy that benefits North Dakota Soybean growers through farmer-led advocacy and partnerships.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Farm Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    05the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    6
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives: $2,486,330 · OtherNorth Dakota Association of Rural Electric CooperativesNORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOD PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $147,370 · OtherNORTH DAKOTA 4-H FOUNDATION: $116,000 · Other+2 more: $130,000 · OtherNorth Dakota State University Foundation: $926,500 · EducationNorth Dakota State Uni…NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION: $360,000 · PhilanthropyFARM RESCUE: $260,000 · Food & NutritionTHE NORTH DAKOTA FARMERS MARKET GROWERS ASSO INC: $202,420 · Community ImprovementFOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY: $92,000 · EnvironmentFIRSTLINK: $15,000 · Human Services
    Other$2,879,700Education$926,500Philanthropy$360,000Food & Nutrition$260,000Community Improvement$202,420Environment$92,000Human Services$15,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorth Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives: $2,486,330 over 9y, 14% of budgetNorth Dakota State University Foundation: $926,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION: $360,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetFARM RESCUE: $260,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetTHE NORTH DAKOTA FARMERS MARKET GROWERS ASSO INC: $202,420 over 5y, 80% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOD PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION: $147,370 over 9y, 18% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA 4-H FOUNDATION: $116,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY: $92,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetFIRSTLINK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives ↗
    • Who funds North Dakota State University Foundation ↗
    • Who funds NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds FARM RESCUE ↗
    • Who funds THE NORTH DAKOTA FARMERS MARKET GROWERS ASSO INC ↗
    • Who funds NORTH DAKOTA LAMB AND WOOD PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds NORTH DAKOTA 4-H FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY ↗
    • Who funds FIRSTLINK ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation Corp?

      Find your warmest path to North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation’s filings →

      More from the funding graph