· Public charity
North Carolina Museum of Life & Science Inc
To create a place of lifelong learning where people, from young child to senior citizen, embrace science as a way of knowing about themselves, their community, and their world.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k13 grants · $171k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $114k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY | $60,107 |
| MUSEUM OF SCIENCE | $54,252 |
| CATALYST CONSULTING GROUP | $25,608 |
| GARIBAY GROUP INC | $24,640 |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY | $21,221 |
| HOLLY-GROVE DIXON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| THE WORKS INC | $10,000 |
| WEST HARLEM ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION INC (WE ACT) | $10,000 |
| VIBRANT HAWAII | $10,000 |
| CITY OF MOAB | $10,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR NATIVE HEALTH INC | $10,000 |
| METRO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $10,000 |
| CARIBBEAN REGENERATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC | $10,000 |
| GROUNDWORK BRIDGEPORT INC | $10,000 |
| YUMA COUNTY FREE LIBRARY DISTRICT | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charitable activities of the Good Work Institute are designed to strengthen collaboration; address legacies of unequal power; and encourage a transition to regenerative ecological and social systems.
The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…
Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…
Develop and provide affordable housing
GWIs mission is to foster the sustained regeneration, improvement and management of the environment by developing community-based partnerships which empower people, businesses and organizations to promote environmental, economic & social…
East Buffalo Development Corporation is a community-based real estate development corporation committed to our mission of leveraging private and public funds to drive equitable and inclusive eastside planning, construction, land use, and…
Build a healthy community by supporting the revitalization of the Binghampton neighborhood of Memphis, Tennessee, through housing and economic development.
To promote, strengthen, and advocate for the community development sector throughout Marylands urban, suburban, and rural communities.
To promote neighborhood revitalization and sustainability in the Hamilton Heights, Wells-Goodfellow and surrounding neighborhoods by assisting others, increasing the quality and availability of affordable and market-rate housing, and…
Rochester Downtown Development Corporation drives economic vitality in Downtown Rochester through innovation and collaboration.
To promote and maintain a strong business climate throughout the city and to foster a healthy and sustainable economy for the benefit of the entire community.
Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds Metro Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds HOLLYGROVE-DIXON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CARIBBEAN REGENERATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORK BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
- Who funds The Center For Native Health Inc ↗
- Who funds West Harlem Environmental Action Inc ↗
- Who funds The Works Inc ↗
- Who funds VIBRANT HAWAII ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization North Carolina Museum of Life & Science Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Carolina Museum of Life & Science Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Groundwork Bridgeport Inc: 100% of income from government
- Museum of Science: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on North Carolina Museum of Life & Science’s filings →