Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norman E and Gwyneth Staats Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$584k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$491k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Animals$870k
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $491k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Paws and Claws Society$491,418
Forgotten Cats$35,000
Hearts and Paws$15,000
Cape-Atlantic CATS$15,000
Marine Mammal Stranding Center$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Pet Savers$5,000
Spay Neuter Intervention Project SNIP$2,500
Freedom Center for Wildlife$2,500
Best Friends Animal Sanctuary$2,000
Lucys House for Prevention of Homeless Pets$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Forgotten Cats: $35k → 10%Asians Cats: $5k → 11%Spay Neuter Intervention Project SN: $3k → 13%Shelter Outreach Services: $15k → 16%Best Friends Animal Sanctuary: $2k → 9%Freedom Center for Wildlife: $3k → 7%Paws and Claws Society: $491k → 8%Strays R Us: $3k → 10%Cape-Atlantic CATS: $15k → 10%Marine Mammal Stranding Center: $10k → 11%Hearts and Paws: $15k → 12%Lucy's House for Prevention of Home: $1k → 10%Asians Cats: $5k → 11%Spay Neuter Intervention Project SNIP: $3k → 13%Best Friends Animal Sanctuary: $2k → 9%Freedom Center for Wildlife: $3k → 7%Paws and Claws Society: $100k → 8%Cape-Atlantic CATS: $5k → 10%Marine Mammal Stranding Center: $10k → 11%Hearts and Paws: $15k → 12%Lucys House for Prevention: $1k → 10%Asian Cats: $5k → 11%Best Friends Animal Sanctuary: $2k → 9%Freedom Center for Wildlife: $3k → 7%Paw and Claws Society: $100k → 8%Cape-Atlantic CATS: $5k → 10%Hearts and Paws: $10k → 12%Lucys House for Prevention of Homeless Pets: $1k → 10%Pet Savers: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$800k · 7 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$800k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+98%

Still filing today

71%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
AnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    Paws and Claws Society Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $691k · revenue -67% · 100% of their budget
  • HA
    HEARTS AND PAWS INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $40k
  • CA
    CAPE ATLANTIC CITIZENS ALTERING STRAY CATS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • SO
    SHELTER OUTREACH SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +98%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SN
    Spay Neuter Intervention Project SN
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cats At the Studios Inc

Cat rescue spay/ nueter

Animals
2
Feline Urban Rescue and Rehab Inc

To reduce the number of cats taken to shelters by promoting the importance of spaying/neutering and cat adoptions.

Animals
3
Feral Cat Solutions

We are an animal welfare charity. we provide free spay and neuter for outdoor cats in Kent County Michigan

Animals
4
Kitten Around Cat Rescue
Animals
5
Unos Home for Wayward Cats and Dogs

Animal rescue organization

Animals
6
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
7
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
8
Hart

Animal shelter and rescue

Animals
9
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
10
Meows and Mutts Rescue

We are an animal rescue who takes dogs and cats from high kill shelters, off the streets and owner surrenders and get them vetted and adopted and we transport them out of high volume areas to the northeast.

Animals
11
Cocoa Kitties

Animal rescue

Animals
12
Peggys Paws

Very small operation, we do T/N/R in the local area

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forgotten Cats Inc; the most unlike its peers is Freedom Center for Wildlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Paws and Claws Society Inc: $691,418 · AnimalsPaws and Claws Society IncFORGOTTEN CATS INC: $35,000 · Animals+5 more: $51,000 · Animals+5 moreHEARTS AND PAWS INC: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherPET SAVERS INC: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherSpay Neuter Intervention Project SNIP: $2,500 · OtherSpay Neuter Intervention Project SN: $2,500 · Other+3 more: $3,000 · OtherCAPE ATLANTIC CITIZENS ALTERING STRAY CATS: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$777,418Other$68,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPaws and Claws Society Inc: $691,418 over 3y, 100% of budgetFORGOTTEN CATS INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCAPE ATLANTIC CITIZENS ALTERING STRAY CATS: $25,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetMarine Mammal Stranding Center: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHELTER OUTREACH SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFREEDOM CENTER FOR WILDLIFE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 24% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Paws and Claws Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ATLANTIC CITIZENS ALTERING STRAY CATS ↗
  • Who funds Marine Mammal Stranding Center ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM CENTER FOR WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds STRAYS R US ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norman E and Gwyneth Staats Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norman E and Gwyneth Staats Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Marine Mammal Stranding Center: 10% of income from government
  • Forgotten Cats Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Norman E and Gwyneth Staats Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Norman E and Gwyneth Staats Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norman E and Gwyneth Staats’ filings →

More from the funding graph