How much did NORMA COURT TRUST grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of NORMA COURT TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

congressinternationalrescuewomenmercychildrenjewish

2020

womenmercyresearcheducation

2021

rescueresearch

2022

healthcareblindresearchchildren's

2023

religious education

2024

educationjewish

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$120

Median grant

States reached

$47k

Total assets

Largest grants

REFORM TEMPLE OF LAGUNA WOODS$906
THE SMILE TRAIN$195
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$120
JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE CO LW$72
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$36
OPERATION SMILE$35

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $520) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$16k · 22 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$16k

$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+43%

Still filing today

50%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RT
REFORM TEMPLE OF LAGUNA WOODS
2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +9%
MERCY SHIPS
4× · 2019–2022 · $840 · revenue +303%
UR
UNION RESCUE MISSION
2× · 2019–2021 · $335 · revenue +155%

Funded once

FT
FEED THE CHILDREN
one grant, 2019 · $200 · revenue +11%
AJ
AMERICAN JEWISH JT DIST
one grant, 2019 · $200
SM
SENATE MAJORITY
one grant, 2019 · $150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve.

International

Rescue International

Missions.me empowers people to change the world. whether it is introducing a street orphan to their new home, leading a nation in a prayer of reconciliation, offering medical relief to the suffering, or hosting large missions teams,…

Religion

Compassion International Incorporated

Releasing children from poverty in Jesus' name.

International

Mercy in Action International

Human Services

Bridge International Inc

International

Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—

Vision Communications International

Vision Communications produces Christian television programming that is broadcast in the Middle East, Europe, and North Africa.

Religion

Mingei International Inc

Mingei international museum is dedicated to furthering the understanding of 'art of the people' (mingei) from all eras and cultures of the world, collecting, conserving and exhibiting useful objects of timeless beauty that are satisfying…

Arts & Culture

Reach International Corporation

Arts & Culture

Mercy Flight Inc

Provide medical transportation primarily for the wny, western pa & southern ontario canada regions.

—

Cross International Inc

(See Schedule O for description.)Cross International cost-effectively serves the poor in developing countries around the world by collaborating with local churches that have infrastructure and experience in the specific country that the…

Religion

Children International

We connect people around the world in the fight to end poverty. working together, we invest in the lives of children and youth, build the healthy environments they need to thrive, and empower them to create lasting change in their own…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hias Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

15/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$12,288Religion$2,004International$1,950Human Services$625Housing & Shelter$585Recreation & Sports$230Arts & Culture$100Animals$70

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NORMA COURT TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: REFORM TEMPLE OF LAGUNA WOODS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 900677816 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on REFORM TEMPLE OF LAGUNA WOODS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Norma Court Trust?

Find your warmest path to Norma Court Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NORMA COURT TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Norma Court Trust?

More from the funding graph

NORMA COURT TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Norma Court Trust?

More from the funding graph