Skip to content

· Public charity

Norcal Premier Soccer

Elevating soccer by developing players, clubs, coaches, and referees.

$88k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Recreation & Sports$124kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kEducation$5k
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $5,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $88,424 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $82,724 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dublin United Scholar Fund$5,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PLACER UNITED SOCCER: $7k → 6%MARIN FC ALLIANCE: $7k → 8%NAPPA SOCCER ACADEMY: $10k → 9%ATHLETICO SANTA ROSA: $15k → 9%Dublin United Scholar Fund: $6k → 10%ARGENTINE FRESNO SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 19%SANTA ROSA UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $46k → 9%DUBLIN UNITED SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5k → 10%EMPIRE SOCCER CLUB: $29k → 9%NORTH COAST FC: $9k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Soccer Club
Recreation & Sports
2
North Shore United Soccer Club Inc

Recreation Youth Soccer

Recreation & Sports
3
Usc - United Soccer Clubs

The mission of the United Soccer Clubs (USC) is to provide an exceptional platform for youth soccer in South Texas. We aim to elevate the game of soccer by fostering player, coach, and referee development, promoting parent education,…

Recreation & Sports
4
Antelope Valley Futbol Club

A soccer league to promote youth development in soccer

Recreation & Sports
5
San Francisco United Soccer Club

San Francisco United Soccer Club teaches girls and boys to play the game of soccer with skills well-honed through hard work and patient coaching. The Club fosters collaboration and teamwork bolstered by warm on- and off-the-field…

—
6
Solano United Soccer Club

Promote, develop, and administer the sport of soccer amongst the youth of Solano County, CA.

Recreation & Sports
7
Chula Vista Futbol Club

Our mission is to be the leader in the south bay by offering boys and girls ages 8 to 18 the opportunity to develop both socially and physically through the sport of soccer. to achieve this our coaches are licensed through us youth…

—
8
Union Sacramento Fc

The organization promotes the development of youth soccer players in the sacramento area by forming teams of talented players who can compete at the highest levels of youth soccer. the organization helps provide the highest quality coaches…

Recreation & Sports
9
Newport Mesa Soccer Club

Our mission is to elevate the quality of soccer played by youth of our community. The club exists for the benefit of our children and not the benefit of any director, coach or volunteer. We are a non-profit youth soccer club that primarily…

Recreation & Sports
10
Sugar City Soccer League
Recreation & Sports
11
Usa Soccer Inc

USA Soccer Inc provides unique opportunities for talented male and female youth athletes to train under the guidance of professional coaches committed to improving the quality of youth soccer.

Recreation & Sports
12
American River Futbol Club

Provide children ages 5-19 a chance to play competitive level soccer.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Rosa United Soccer Club; the most unlike its peers is Monterey County Futbol Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTA ROSA UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $46,485 · OtherSANTA ROSA UNITED SOCCER CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $9,054 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDUBLIN UNITED SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,000 · OtherDUBLIN UNITED SCHOLARSHIP FUNDARGENTINA FRESNO SOCCER CLUB: $5,000 · OtherARGENTINA FRESNO SOCCER CLUBAtletico Santa Rosa: $14,816 · Recreation & SportsAtletico Santa RosaNAPA SOCCER ACADEMY INC: $9,500 · Recreation & SportsNAPA SOCCER ACADEMY INCThe Marin Football Club: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Marin Football ClubDUBLIN UNITED SOCCER LEAGUE INCORPORATED: $5,700 · Recreation & SportsDUBLIN UNITED SOCCER LEAGUE IN…EMPIRE SOCCER CLUB INC: $28,931 · Youth DevelopmentEMPIRE SOCCER CLUB INCPLACER UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLACER UNITED SOCCER CLUB
Other$65,539Recreation & Sports$37,016Youth Development$35,931

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA ROSA UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $46,485 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetAtletico Santa Rosa: $14,816 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNAPA SOCCER ACADEMY INC: $9,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetPLACER UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $7,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDUBLIN UNITED SOCCER LEAGUE INCORPORATED: $5,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norcal Premier Soccer funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norcal Premier Soccer. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Norcal Premier Soccer?

    Find your warmest path to Norcal Premier Soccer through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norcal Premier Soccer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph