Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

Noah and Linda Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$299k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
11
Organizations funded FY2022
36%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Noah and Linda Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Donors Fund Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Noah and Linda Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $299k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
2
’18
3
’19
4
’20
4
’21
6
’22
3
’23
0
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$65,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 12
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
2
Total assets, FY2022
$3.4M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 36% of the organizations Noah and Linda Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 24% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHuman ServicesReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202211$234k36%
FY202110$43k70%
FY20208$122k38%
FY201912$129k75%
FY20189$75k67%
FY20179$99kn/a
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$606kReligion$524kEducation$126kHealth$15kHuman Services$15kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc$68,00030%
Mesivta of Clifton Inc$55,00021%
Yeshiva Shaarei Oorah Inc$42,60031%
Friends of the Brisker Yeshiva Inc$42,2501n/a
Congregation Bnos Yaakov Inc$37,50010%
Stam Gemilas Chesed Fund Inc$30,0001n/a
Yeshiva Gedola of South Jersey Inc$25,0001n/a
Cong Bais Sholom$25,0003n/a
Or Meir$15,000143%
Bonei Olam Inc$10,80010%
Show all 19 grantees
All grantees of Noah and Linda Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc$68,00030%
Mesivta of Clifton Inc$55,00021%
Yeshiva Shaarei Oorah Inc$42,60031%
Friends of the Brisker Yeshiva Inc$42,2501n/a
Congregation Bnos Yaakov Inc$37,50010%
Stam Gemilas Chesed Fund Inc$30,0001n/a
Yeshiva Gedola of South Jersey Inc$25,0001n/a
Cong Bais Sholom$25,0003n/a
Or Meir$15,000143%
Bonei Olam Inc$10,80010%
A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange$4,00010%
Yeshivath Radin$2,5001n/a
Friends of Project Raanana$1,80011%
Lev Berel Inc$1,25010%
Bais Medrash L'Torah a Nj Nonprofit Corp$1,15010%
Mikvah USA Inc$1,0001n/a
Mesivta of North Jersey Inc$7201n/a
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah$50010%
Congregation Zichron Refoel Inc$2501n/a

Plus 27 recipients with no EIN on record ($391k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Noah and Linda Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 11 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: $68,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMesivta of Clifton Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetYeshiva Shaarei Oorah Inc: $42,600 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCongregation Bnos Yaakov Inc: $37,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOr Meir: $15,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $10,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Project Raanana: $1,800 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLev Berel Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBais Medrash L'Torah a Nj Nonprofit Corp: $1,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBais Medrash Mayan Hatorah: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Fund IncNJ23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jdb Charitable Foundation · Lakewood Cheder School Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Aar Charitable Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Noah and Linda Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Noah and Linda Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Noah and Linda Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Noah and Linda Foundation

How much does Noah and Linda Foundation give?
Noah and Linda Foundation reported 12 grants totaling $298,800 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 12 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Noah and Linda Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (44%), Religion (38%), Education (9%).
Who are Noah and Linda Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc ($68k), Mesivta of Clifton Inc ($55k), Yeshiva Shaarei Oorah Inc ($43k).
Does Noah and Linda Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Noah and Linda Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Noah and Linda Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donors Fund Inc, Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles, The Ojc Fund.
Where is Noah and Linda Foundation based?
Noah and Linda Foundation is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Noah and Linda’s filings →

More from the funding graph