Skip to content
Nj State Pba Survivor & Welfare Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Nj State Pba Survivor & Welfare Fund

The mission of the organization is to provide support for and benefits to the families of officers killed in the line of duty and other officers in need and to assist in the detection, apprehension, and conviction of criminals who kill or injure law enforcement officers.

$234k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$187kPublic Safety & Disaster$135kArts & Culture$56kPublic Benefit$50kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$10kEducation$10k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $92,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $234,123 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $141,623 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN$30,000
POLICE UNITY TOUR INC$25,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$10,000
GARDEN STATE COPS$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
WHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POLICE ORGANIZATIONS RELIEF FUND: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 6 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$386k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+68%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $111k · revenue +24%
  • POLICE UNITY TOUR INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +72%
  • WA
    WHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • WI
    WHATSMYNAME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +68% · 45% of their budget
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POLICE ORGANIZATIONS RELIEF FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +897%
  • AC
    ALADS CARES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unite Nationwide for Cops Under Fire Foundation Aka Uncuff the Innocent
Crime & Legal
2
Dallas Police Cycling Team

Raising money for the national police memorial

—
3
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
4
Cop Shot Inc

The purpose of cop shot is to offer a standing reward of $10,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of anyone shooting a new york city police officer.to determine that an individual of organization qualifies to receive…

—
5
Troopers for a Safer Ohio

Supporting & advocating -laws that make ohio's highways safer for the driving public -legislation that improves the state's criminal justice system -public policy that enhances the law enforcement profession…

Employment
6
Concerns of Police Survivors

Support for families of officers lost

—
7
The Honor Legion of the Police Departments of the State of Nj Inc

See schedule othe honor legion of the police departments of the state of new jersey was formed to support, assist monetarily and morally, and in any other way possible a new jersey law enforcement officer's family when the officer has been…

Philanthropy
8
Concerns of Police Survivors Indiana Chapter

Indiana concers of police survivors cops operates as peer support network for survivors of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty as determined by federal criteria.

—
9
National Association of Police Organizations Inc

The national association of police organizations (napo) was established to unite all law enforcement organizations within the united states in order to promote and maintain federal legislation and policies most beneficial to law…

—
10
Law Enforcement United Inc

To raise awareness of law enforcement officers who have died in the line of duty, and support the survivors left behind.

Philanthropy
11
Chief Michael Maloney Memorial Fund

Our mission is to provide relief fort he distressed members, spouses and children of new england public safety who have been killed or injured in the line of duty. such relief may take the form of direct financial assistance to the victim…

Public Benefit
12
Fallen Blue Quilts

This nonprofit corporation was formed to comfort the families of law enforcement officers who have been killed in the line of duty. donna marsinick, a mother of a police officer, hand quilts a "thin blue line" quilt for the family of every…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC: $110,500 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INCGARDEN STATE SURVIVORS NEW JERSY COPS CHAPTER: $35,000 · OtherGARDEN STATE SURVIVORS NEW JERSY COPS CH…ALADS CARES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherALADS CARES FOUNDATIONSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATI…POLICE UNITY TOUR INC: $100,000 · Crime & LegalPOLICE UNITY TOUR INCWHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION: $72,703 · Arts & CultureWHERE ANGELS PLAY…SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYM…WHATSMYNAME INC: $50,000 · Public BenefitWHATSMYNAME …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $17,500 · HealthNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POLICE ORGANIZATIONS RELIEF FUND: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$165,500Crime & Legal$100,000Arts & Culture$72,703Recreation & Sports$50,000Public Benefit$50,000Health$17,500Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC: $110,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPOLICE UNITY TOUR INC: $100,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWHERE ANGELS PLAY FOUNDATION: $72,703 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHATSMYNAME INC: $50,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetGARDEN STATE SURVIVORS NEW JERSY COPS CHAPTER: $35,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALADS CARES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nj State Pba Survivor & Welfare Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nj State Pba Survivor & Welfare Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nj State Pba Survivor & Welfare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home