· Private foundation
Nipera Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $389k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $174k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COBALT INSTITUTE | $112,520 |
| Individual grant recipient | $61,327 |
| WCA ENVIRONMENT LIMITED | $42,578 |
| GRADIENT CORP | $38,880 |
| INTERNATIONAL ZINC ASSOCIATION | $38,213 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,435 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA | $26,000 |
| WCA ENVIRONMENTAL LTD | $25,000 |
| CSIRO COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRY RESEARCH ORGANISATION | $25,000 |
| WCA ENVIRONMENTAL LTD | $24,765 |
| Individual grant recipient | $23,227 |
| PT BURSON COHN WOLFE | $22,272 |
| EUROMETAUX | $16,103 |
| WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC | $15,000 |
| CHINESE RESEARCH ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES | $14,260 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 55% of grant dollars ($2.6M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 45% that went abroad ($2.1M) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 45% of all-years giving ($2.1M)
10 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
35 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CRCHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES ASHLAND LLC3× · 2020–2022 · $1.5M
- WEWCA ENVIRONMENT LIMITED5× · 2020–2024 · $529k
- WEWINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC5× · 2020–2024 · $225k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $30k
- SWSOLID WASTE AND CHEMICALS MANAGEMENT CENTERone grant, 2023 · $28k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $24k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Nipera Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nipera Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Nipera’s filings →