Skip to content

· Public charity

Nioga Library System

To provide a variety of library services to the member libraries in niagara, orleans, and genesee counties and perform a number of functions which assist its member public libraries in serving their patrons.

$451k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$1.4M
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $382,326, the rows itemized in this filing. The $450,913 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $68,587 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $170k
$8,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NIAGARA FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY$169,929
LOCKPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY$32,290
WILSON COMMUNITY LIBRARY$22,273
RANSOMVILLE FREE LIBRARY$21,955
SANBORN-PEKIN FREE LIBRARY$21,955
YOUNGSTOWN FREE LIBRARY$21,955
NORTH TONAWANDA PUBLIC LIBRARY$21,532
HOAG LIBRARY$9,444
LEE-WHEDON MEMORIAL LIBRARY$8,200
WOODWARD MEMORIAL LIBRARY$7,560
COMMUNITY FREE LIBRARY$7,273
RICHMOND MEMORIAL LIBRARY$6,450
CORFU PUBLIC LIBRARY$6,446
BYRON-BERGEN PUBLIC LIBRARY$6,425
HOLLWEDEL MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY$6,241
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAXTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $9k → 10%HOAG LIBRARY: $12k → 11%NEWSTEAD PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7k → 13%SEYMOUR LIBRARY: $7k → 14%NORTH TONAWANDA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $26k → 14%HAXTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $6k → 10%COMMUNITY FREE LIBRARY: $10k → 11%NIAGARA FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $219k → 13%HAMLIN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7k → 14%NORTH TONAWANDA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $22k → 14%BYRON-BERGEN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $9k → 10%HOAG LIBRARY: $9k → 11%NIAGARA FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $170k → 13%NORTH TONAWANDA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $11k → 14%BYRON-BERGEN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6k → 10%COMMUNITY FREE LIBRARY: $7k → 11%NIAGARA FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $123k → 13%NEWFANE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $24k → 14%CORFU PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10k → 10%HOAG LIBRARY: $5k → 11%YOUNGSTOWN FREE LIBRARY: $22k → 14%CORFU PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6k → 10%YATES COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $9k → 11%WILSON COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $22k → 14%HOLLWEDEL MEMORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6k → 10%YATES COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $6k → 11%YOUNGSTOWN FREE LIBRARY: $22k → 14%RICHMOND MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $14k → 10%LEE-WHEDON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $11k → 11%WILSON COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $22k → 14%WOODWARD MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $10k → 10%LEE-WHEDON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $8k → 11%SANBORN-PEKIN FREE LIBRARY: $22k → 14%RICHMOND MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $6k → 10%RANSOMVILLE FREE LIBRARY: $22k → 14%WOODWARD MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $8k → 10%RANSOMVILLE FREE LIBRARY: $22k → 14%RICHMOND MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $6k → 10%LEWISTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $25k → 14%LOCKPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $32k → 14%LOCKPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $32k → 14%LOCKPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 16 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$1.7M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+11%

Still filing today

44%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YF
    Youngstown Free Library
    2× · 2024–2025 · $44k · revenue +1%
  • LM
    LEE-WHEDON MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $19k · revenue +134%
  • YC
    Yates Community Library
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • LP
    LEWISTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • NP
    NEWFANE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2024 · $24k
  • NP
    NEWSTEAD PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Field Memorial Library
—
2
Monessen Public Library

Monessen Public Library provides collection facilities and services to the people of the Monessen community, which assists them in fulfilling their need for information, research sources, and cultural enrichment.

—
3
Hammond Public Library

public library

Education
4
Port Byron Library Inc

Free Public Library

Education
5
New Ipswich Library
—
6
Dolgeville Manheim Public Library

public library

Education
7
Quechee Library Association

The Quechee Library serves as a public library and freely provides access and materials for information, lifelong learning, entertainment, and reflection, as well as programs to foster community and engagement.

—
8
Simsbury Free Library
Education
9
Woodgate Free Library

Public Library

Education
10
Stony Creek Free Library

Public Library

—
11
William H Bush Memorial Library
—
12
Bodman Memorial Library

Library

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ransomville Free Library; the most unlike its peers is Corfu Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS PUBLIC LIBRARIES IN NIOGA LIBRARY SYSTEM: $719,610 · OtherVARIOUS PUBLIC LIBRARIES IN NIOGA LIBRARY SYSTEMNIAGARA FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $511,804 · OtherNIAGARA FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARYLOCKPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $76,024 · OtherNORTH TONAWANDA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $58,742 · Other+13 more: $230,731 · Other+13 moreWilson Community Library: $44,470 · EducationWilson Com…Youngstown Free Library: $43,842 · EducationYoungstown…LEWISTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $24,519 · EducationLEWISTON P…SANBORN-PEKIN FREE LIBRARY: $21,955 · EducationSANBORN-PE…LEE-WHEDON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $19,345 · EducationLEE-WHEDON…Yates Community Library: $15,270 · EducationYates Comm…
Other$1,596,911Education$169,401

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWilson Community Library: $44,470 over 2y, 18% of budgetYoungstown Free Library: $43,842 over 2y, 13% of budgetRANSOMVILLE FREE LIBRARY: $43,842 over 2y, 15% of budgetLEWISTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $24,519 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSANBORN-PEKIN FREE LIBRARY: $21,955 over 1y, 14% of budgetLEE-WHEDON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $19,345 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCommunity Free Library: $17,308 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetYates Community Library: $15,270 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetHAXTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $15,250 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetSEYMOUR LIBRARY: $7,142 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wilson Community Library ↗
  • Who funds Youngstown Free Library ↗
  • Who funds RANSOMVILLE FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds LEWISTON PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds SANBORN-PEKIN FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds LEE-WHEDON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Community Free Library ↗
  • Who funds CORFU PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Yates Community Library ↗
  • Who funds HAXTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds SEYMOUR LIBRARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nioga Library System funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nioga Library System. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nioga Library System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph