Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nick G Zavolas Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Religion$40kEducation$9kArts & Culture$7kFood & Nutrition$5kHealth$2kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$560k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Saint Katherine Greek Orthodox Chur$10,000
St Katherine's Paideia Preschool$5,000
Saint George Greek Orthodox Church$5,000
KNEAD COMMUNITY CAFE$5,000
Hillwood Estate Museum and Garden$2,500
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$2,000
Wounded Warrior Project$2,000
The Art League of Ocean City$1,500
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WASHINGTON$1,500
BERLIN MARYLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT$1,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospita$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$500
AMERICAN HEART SOCIETY$500
GREEK MUSEUM OF CHICAGO$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41k · 4 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$41k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+5%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEmploymentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SK
    Saint Katherine Greek Orthodox Chur
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k
  • SG
    Saint George Greek Orthodox Church
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k
  • HE
    HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • TU
    The University of Baltimore Foundat
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadingage Inc

The mission of leadingage is to be the trusted voice for aging. our 6,000+ members and partners include nonprofit organizations representing the entire field of aging services, 38 state associations, hundreds of businesses, consumer…

Housing & Shelter
2
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
5
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
8
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
9
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
10
National Association of Landscape Professionals Inc

Nalp's mission is to advocate for lawn and landscape industry growth and the benefits we provide to our communities. nalp works to:advocate relentlessly: advance and defend the interests of the lawn and landscape industry at all levels of…

Unclassified
11
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Longwood Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Saint Katherine Greek Orthodox Chur: $25,000 · OtherSaint Katherine Greek Orthodox ChurSaint George Greek Orthodox Church: $10,000 · OtherSaint George Greek Orthodox ChurchThe University of Baltimore Foundat: $5,000 · OtherThe University of Baltimore FoundatSt Katherine's Paideia Preschool: $5,000 · OtherSt Katherine's Paideia PreschoolArt League of Ocean City Inc: $2,500 · Other+6 more: $3,500 · Other+6 moreKNEAD COMMUNITY CAFE: $5,000 · EmploymentHILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS: $3,500 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON INC: $1,500 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 · HealthLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $250 · Philanthropy
Other$51,000Employment$5,000Arts & Culture$3,500Education$3,000Human Services$2,000Community Improvement$1,500Health$500Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArt League of Ocean City Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONGWOOD GARDENS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nick G Zavolas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nick G Zavolas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Art League of Ocean City Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nick G Zavolas’ filings →

More from the funding graph