Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nichols Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Recreation & Sports$102kEducation$69kReligion$65kHealth$15kHousing & Shelter$13kCommunity Improvement$7kArts & Culture$7kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$574k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY GATEWAY$10,000
CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION$10,000
LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR SHREVEPORT BLIGHT FUND$5,000
CHRISTUS HIGHLAND FOUNDATION$1,000
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $8k → 22%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $3k → 22%HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 12 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$256k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+46%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +128%
  • CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +163%
  • HA
    HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HA
    HOLY ANGELS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • LP
    LOYOLA PARENTS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rebuilding Together New Orleans

Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.

Philanthropy
2
Shreveport Green

Shreveport green is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the city's environment and enhancing its economy through public education and community beautification, litter abatement, and recycling projects

—
3
Greater Baton Rouge Industry Alliance Inc

Drive solutions to common issues with an emphasis on workforce development and safety performance.

—
4
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
5
Central Houston Inc

See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.

—
6
Greater New Orleans Development Foundation

To foster regional economic development and create quality jobs within the metropolitan new orleans area.

Community Improvement
7
Center for Conflict Resolution

The mission of the organization (ccr) shall be to work with individuals, communities, courts, and other institutions to manage and resolve conflict.

Crime & Legal
8
The Arc of Louisiana

The arc of louisiana advocates for and with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.

—
9
Community Rebuilders

Rebuilding hope through housing opportunities for families and individuals with support services during transitions.

Housing & Shelter
10
Greater Greenville Association of Realtors Inc

Providing standards, guidelines, and procedures to those members engaged in practice of the real estate profession

—
11
Louisiana Restaurant Association Inc

Hospitality industry trade association

—
12
Ccri Inc

The mission of CCRI is to enhance and enrich the lives and learning of people with disabilities. We help people overcome obstacles by offering unique community opportunities to children, adults, and families affected by disability. Our…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Common Ground Community Inc; the most unlike its peers is Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCHI OMEGA FOUNDATIONST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $37,600 · OtherST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CATHEDRALCHRISTUS HIGHLAND FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherCHRISTUS HIGHLAND FOUNDATIONST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS: $10,000 · OtherST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELSFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherST MARK'S CATHEDRAL SCHOOL: $5,500 · OtherLOYOLA COLLEGE PREP: $5,150 · OtherHOLY ANGELS: $5,000 · OtherLOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR SHREVEPORT BLIGHT FUND: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $8,250 · Other+6 moreRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INCHOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I: $13,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,000 · Community ImprovementSHREVEPORT METROPOLITAN BALLET: $6,500 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB: $1,000 · EnvironmentCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY INC: $800 · EnvironmentGREAT RESULTS EQUINE ASSISTED THERAPIES: $500 · Health
Other$143,500Education$100,000Human Services$15,000Housing & Shelter$12,500Community Improvement$7,000Arts & Culture$6,500Environment$1,800Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHREVEPORT METROPOLITAN BALLET: $6,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY INC: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLY ANGELS RESIDENTIAL FACILITY I ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT METROPOLITAN BALLET ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT RESULTS EQUINE ASSISTED THERAPIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Powers Foundation IncLA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Powers Foundation Inc · Grayson Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nichols Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nichols Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nichols Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nichols Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nichols Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph