Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nicholas R Rizzi Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$51kHealth$6kReligion$2kCommunity Improvement$2kFood & Nutrition$1kHuman Services$1kPhilanthropy$750Arts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$68k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARCUS SCHOOL$3,000
SUMTER SCHOOLS ENHANCEMENT FOUNDAIO$2,000
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICATOBI$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDADONOVAN BROUG$1,000
THE ANAWIM INC$1,000
NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION$1,000
THE PALLOTINE FATHERS AND BROTHERS$750
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH FOUNDAT$500
PAN-MASS CHALLENGE$500
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$500
LIFE NETWORK$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE ANAWIM INC: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
CT
CO
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 18 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
9

Total granted

$59k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+37%

Still filing today

28%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LN
    Life Network
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +66%
  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +4%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUMTER COUNTY ENHANCEMENT FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • CP
    CONTRIBUTIONS PAID
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDALUKE WE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
11
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Anawim Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $14,000 · OtherST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCHST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $5,500 · OtherST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOLSUMTER SCHOOLS ENHANCEMENT FOUNDAIO: $5,500 · OtherSUMTER SCHOOLS ENHANCEMENT FOUNDAIOSUMTER SCHOOLS ENHANCEMENT FOUNDATI: $4,500 · OtherSUMTER SCHOOLS ENHANCEMENT FOUNDATITRINITY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $3,500 · OtherTRINITY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INCTHE PALLOTINE FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $2,100 · OtherSUNY EMPIRE STATE COLLEGE: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLADAM LEPER: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Other+12 more: $11,975 · Other+12 moreNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $2,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,250 · EducationUniversity of New Haven: $1,000 · EducationLife Network: $2,500 · HealthThe Anawim Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$55,075Recreation & Sports$5,000Education$4,250Health$2,500Human Services$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLife Network: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anawim Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of New Haven: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Life Network ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Anawim Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of New Haven ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nicholas R Rizzi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nicholas R Rizzi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • University of New Haven: 2% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nicholas R Rizzi Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Nicholas R Rizzi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nicholas R Rizzi’s filings →

More from the funding graph