Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nicholas Patterson Perpetual Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$252kHuman Services$39kArts & Culture$13kPhilanthropy$10kFood & Nutrition$5kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
JACOBS INSTITUTE$1,000
BUFFALO MARITIME CENTER$1,000
BUFFALO HISTORY MUSEUM$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CANOPY OF NEIGHBORS: $13k → 13%CANOPY OF NEIGHBORS: $13k → 13%CANOPY OF NEIGHBORS: $13k → 13%OLMSTED CENTER FOR SIGHT: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
VA
DC
MS
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$146k · 23 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
81

Total granted

$146k
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+49%

Still filing today

9%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Canopy of Neighbors Inc
    3× · 2018–2021 · $39k · revenue +33%
  • BE
    BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +42%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2019–2021 · $6k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • UNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -21%
  • BUFFALO PREP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
Invest Buffalo Niagara Foundation Inc

Invest buffalo niagara foundation, inc. is a vehicle to solicit charitable contributions to develop programs, collaborate with, and provide funding to organizations that advance and encourage economic development in western new york.

Community Improvement
3
University at Buffalo Foundation Incubator Inc

The organization operates an incubator facility to identify and aid start-up businesses with a purpose of stimulating development and increasing interaction between the university at buffalo and such businesses.

Education
4
The Western New York Foundation
5
Buffalo Institute for Contemporary Art

The Buffalo Institiute for Contemporary Art (Bica) is a art and educational project for Buffalo, NY. Through Innovative exhibitions, cross-discipplinary skills-based programming, and arts ecology development, bica mission is to break down…

Arts & Culture
6
Western New York Impact Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Center for Agricultural Development and Entrepreneurship Inc

Cade's mission is to increase the number and diversity of successful farm enterprises and related businesses in new york.

Community Improvement
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Buffalo Lighthouse Association Inc

Preservation, protection and restoration of the buffalo new york lighthouses and to maintain and develop the area surrounding them in accordance with their historical significance.

10
The Real Estate Board of New York Inc

1. to unite in common organization those professionally engaged in real estate. 2. to protect and promote the mutual interests of its members. 3. to formulate and maintain ethical standards for the guidance of its members in their…

11
Buffalo Media Resources Inc

We envision a community that uses film & digital media to celebrate freedom of expression and to continue a legacy of innovation in media arts through education, exhibitions, and equipment access programs.

Arts & Culture
12
Invest Buffalo Niagara Inc

To attract new employers to the buffalo niagara region through outreach to growing companies around the world. to support business attraction, expansion and entrepreneurship, invest buffalo niagara collaborates with local businesses,…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Buffalo and Erie County and the most unlike its peers is Buffalo & Erie County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherBUFFALO PREP INC — $10,000 · Other+99 more — $251,500 · Other+99 moreCanopy of Neighbors Inc — $39,000 · Human ServicesCanopy of Nei…VIA VISUALLY IMPAIRED ADVANCEMENT — $2,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY — $10,000 · PhilanthropyPROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP — $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC — $1,000 · HealthBUFFALO MARITIME CENTER INC — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$282,000Human Services$41,000Philanthropy$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Health$1,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCanopy of Neighbors Inc — $39,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetBUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JACOBS INSTITUTE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO MARITIME CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Canopy of Neighbors Inc
  • Who funds BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY
  • Who funds BUFFALO PREP INC
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Margaret L Wendt FoundationNY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Margaret L Wendt Foundation · The Baird Foundation · The Western New York Foundation · Simple Gifts Fund · The Frank G Raichle Foundation · James H Cummings Foundation Inc · First Niagara Foundation · The John R Oishei Foundation · Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc · Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Joseph and Anna Gartner Foundation · Paul & Helen Ellis Charitable Trust Trubee Wealth Advisors

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nicholas Patterson Perpetual Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nicholas Patterson Perpetual Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Nicholas Patterson Perpetual Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph