Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Nfx

The organization follows the mission as set forth in its articles of incorporation.

$15M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$40M
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $14,742,234 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,047,154 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $304,920 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$427,713
Median grant
12
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$3,023,731
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$2,492,685
CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION$1,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$1,184,294
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$887,596
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION$859,027
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE$619,262
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS$537,597
THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION$427,713
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$395,815
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$360,045
PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER$360,000
TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY$360,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$360,000
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$359,550
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $859k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $2.5M → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 8%CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $1.2M → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $888k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $400k → 11%TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $360k → 18%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $360k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $350k → 16%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $339k → 22%PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER: $519k → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $360k → 19%THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $478k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $2.4M → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 8%CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $747k → 16%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $360k → 11%THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE: $471k → 15%PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER: $360k → 19%THE GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $428k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $2.0M → 7%CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $553k → 16%THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE: $327k → 15%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $656k → 7%CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 17%BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE: $619k → 15%CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 17%CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 17%CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
NC
LA
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 6 repeat orgs$8.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$22M
$8.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+4%

Still filing today

33%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $10M · revenue +58%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM
    6× · 2018–2024 · $8.0M
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    2× · 2023–2024 · $905k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2024 · $3.0M · revenue +8%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $888k · revenue +13%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    one grant, 2024 · $859k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
9
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
12
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Children's Tumor Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION — $10,470,750 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATIONTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $3,023,731 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIAChildren's Hospital Corporation — $859,027 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation+1 more — $349,540 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $7,996,654 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $905,281 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY — $878,771 · OtherLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITYNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC — $797,602 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INCUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS — $537,597 · Other+4 more — $1,454,111 · Other+4 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $9,613,905 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELA…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $887,596 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYDUKE UNIVERSITY — $760,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+1 more — $360,045 · EducationBATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE — $619,262 · Science & Tech
Health$14,703,048Other$12,570,016Education$11,621,546Science & Tech$619,262

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION — $10,470,750 over 7y, 12% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $9,613,905 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $3,023,731 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $887,596 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $859,027 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $760,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE — $619,262 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $360,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $349,540 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nfx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nfx?

Find your warmest path to Nfx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph