Skip to content

· Private foundation

Newburn Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$133kHuman Services$85kReligion$79kYouth Development$32kHousing & Shelter$24kFood & Nutrition$21kEducation$8kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$4,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$17,500
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$10,000
DOVE MEDICAL$7,000
ARC OF LANE COUNTY$5,000
BOISE RESCUE MISSION$4,500
SHELTER BOX$3,000
CHOOSE LIFE IDAHO$2,000
AGAPE YOUTH$2,000
INSTABALLET$1,000
COLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHOOSE LIFE IDAHO: $2k → 8%SHELTER BOX USA: $2k → 9%SHELTER BOX: $3k → 10%SHELTER BOX USA: $1k → 9%SHELTER BOX: $3k → 10%SHELTER BOX: $3k → 10%SHELTER BOX: $3k → 10%SHELTER BOX: $3k → 10%SHELTER BOX: $2k → 10%SHELTER BOX: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374k · 17 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$374k
$12k

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    Dove Medical
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +82%
  • RELIEF NURSERY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +130%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $21k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • EW
    EGAN WARMING CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • SR
    SPRINGFIELD RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EMERALD
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womenspace

Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.

Human Services
2
Eclb

Every Child mobilizes community to support children and families impacted by foster care in Linn, Benton, Lincoln.

Human Services
3
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
4
Lifeline Connections

Through superior customer service, high quality programs, and well-trained and dedicated staff, we inspire hope and lifesaving changes for people affected by substance use and mental health conditions.

Health
5
Lane Workforce Partnership

To meet the workforce needs of employers and individuals through partnerships and innovations in lane county, oregon.

—
6
Catholic Community Services of Lane County Inc

Responding to christ's message to love our neighbors as ourselves, catholic community services offers immediate help by providing food and other assistance to anyone in need and seeks to instill hope by helping lane county individuals and…

Human Services
7
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
8
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
9
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services
10
Lutheran Services in Iowa Inc

Lutheran services in iowa's mission is based on a christian philosophy of faithful service to all our neighbors. our mission is, indeed, why we do what we do: lutheran services in iowa responds to the love of jesus christ through…

Human Services
11
Prevail Ca

To provide safety, compassion, and respect as we educate, empower, and advocate for individuals, families, and young people.

Human Services
12
Lane Community College Education Association

Lane Community College Education Association is the union that represents 200 full-time and 375 part-time faculty members at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. LCCEA is an affiliated unit of the Oregon Education Association (OEA)…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eugene Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Instaballet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $79,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $78,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINEDove Medical: $38,500 · OtherDove MedicalRELIEF NURSERY INC: $30,000 · OtherRELIEF NURSERY INCFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $21,000 · OtherFOOD FOR LANE COUNTYBOISE RESCUE MISSION: $20,000 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONLANE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $14,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF EME: $11,000 · Other+6 more: $26,000 · Other+6 moreEUGENE MISSION INC: $15,500 · Housing & ShelterSHELTERCARE: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterSHELTERBOX USA INC: $20,500 · Human ServicesCHOOSE LIFE IDAHO INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPEARL BUCK CENTER INCORPORATED: $8,000 · EducationEugene Christian School: $6,000 · EducationCOLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $1,000 · EducationWILLAMETTE FAMILY INC: $6,000 · HealthBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF EMERALD VALLEY: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentINSTABALLET: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$318,000Housing & Shelter$23,500Human Services$22,500Education$15,000Health$6,000Youth Development$4,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDove Medical: $38,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetRELIEF NURSERY INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $20,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEUGENE MISSION INC: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLANE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $14,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetARC OF LANE COUNTY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEARL BUCK CENTER INCORPORATED: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERCARE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEugene Christian School: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWILLAMETTE FAMILY INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF EMERALD VALLEY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHOOSE LIFE IDAHO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetINSTABALLET: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dove Medical ↗
  • Who funds RELIEF NURSERY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds EUGENE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds LANE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PEARL BUCK CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERCARE ↗
  • Who funds Eugene Christian School ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF EMERALD VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CHOOSE LIFE IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTABALLET ↗
  • Who funds COLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chambers Family FoundationOR26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chambers Family Foundation · McKay Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Pacificsource Foundation for Health Improvement · Food for Lane County · United Way of Lane County · The Woodard Family Foundation · Alton F Baker Family Foundation · The Mehlum Family Foundation · First Fruits Foundation · R & M Clark Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Newburn Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Newburn Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Arc of Lane County: 79% of income from government
  • Pearl Buck Center Incorporated: 76% of income from government
  • Relief Nursery Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Sheltercare: 18% of income from government
  • Instaballet: 15% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Emerald Valley: 15% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • Willamette Family Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Newburn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph