Skip to content

· Public charity

Newberg Rotary Foundation

The NEWBERG ROTARY FOUNDATION's primary purpose is to promote and encourage the health, education and general welfare of youth, principally in newberg & local areas.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$160kRecreation & Sports$121kYouth Development$60kHuman Services$59kInternational$51kCommunity Improvement$41kHealth$22kReligion$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $36,480, the rows itemized in this filing. The $145,568 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $109,088 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$8,595
Median grant
1
States reached
$740k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIVIEN LEE FOUNDATION$13,880
NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT$8,595
CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT$8,000
NEWBERG ROTARY EARLY BIRDS$6,005
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 12% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $37k → 11%PEACE VILLAGE GLOBAL: $12k → 12%HELPING HANDS: $29k → 13%ROTARY INTERNATION FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $20k → 11%HELPING HANDS: $17k → 13%CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $20k → 11%NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $16k → 11%NEWBERG BOOSTER CLUB: $15k → 11%NEWBERG ROTARY CLUB: $15k → 11%VIVIEN LEE FOUNDATION: $14k → 11%WORLD COMMUNITY SERVICE: $13k → 11%WORLD COMMUNITY SERVICE: $12k → 11%NEWBERG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $12k → 11%NEWBERG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $12k → 11%NEWBERG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $12k → 11%CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $11k → 11%CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $11k → 11%CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $11k → 11%NEWBERG PUBLIC LIBRARY: $11k → 11%CHEHALEM PARK AND REC: $10k → 11%EDWARDS VOLUNTEER ORG: $10k → 11%CLOSE UP PROGRAM: $10k → 11%WORLD COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10k → 11%NEWBERG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $10k → 11%CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $10k → 11%NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $9k → 11%NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $9k → 11%NEWBERG EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $9k → 11%NEWBERG ROTARY EARLY BIRDS: $8k → 11%CHEHALEM FAMILY YOUTH SERVICES: $8k → 11%CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $8k → 11%NEWBERG PUBLIC LIBRARY: $8k → 11%CHEHALEM FAMILY YOUTH SERVICES: $8k → 11%NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8k → 11%NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8k → 11%WORLD COMMUNITY SERVICE: $8k → 11%FRIENDSVIEW RETIREMENT COMM: $7k → 11%FRIENDSVIEW RETIREMENT COMM: $7k → 11%NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $7k → 11%NEWBERG ROTARY EARLY BIRDS: $6k → 11%NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $6k → 11%NEWBERG ROTARY EARLY BIRDS: $6k → 11%NEWBERG ROTARY CLUB: $6k → 11%NEWBERG ROTARY EARLY BIRDS: $6k → 11%JUNIOR ORCHESTRA OF YAMHILL: $10k → 11%YAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY: $10k → 11%YAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$423k · 9 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +348% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$423k
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+348%
+29%

Still filing today

22%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT
    6× · 2017–2025 · $128k
  • NS
    NEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT
    6× · 2017–2025 · $63k
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $47k

Funded once

  • NB
    NEWBERG BOOSTER CLUB INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -24%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • NP
    NEWBERG PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newberg Baseball

Baseball league for youth.

Youth Development
2
Newberg Rotary Foundation

The newberg rotary foundation's primary purpose is to promote and encourage the health, education and general welfare of youth, principally in newberg & local areas. international humanitarian projects are also supported.

Community Improvement
3
Kiwanis Club of Newburgh Foundation Inc
—
4
New Braunfels Downtown Rotary Scholarship Fund

To provide scholorships

Education
5
Coquille Rotary Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
6
Craig Newmark Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Newfield Elementary School - Pfo

To promote the welfare of children and youth in home, school and community. To bring together the home and school, that parents and teachers may cooperate in the education of the child. To develop relationships between the educators and…

Education
8
The Neuberger Berman Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Education Foundation of New Berlin

To support and strengthen excellence in education, athletics and extra-curriculars throughout the district.

Education
10
Newburgh Elementary School Pat Inc
Youth Development
11
News Tribune Scholarship Foundation
—
12
The Newton Family Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newberg Education Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Chehalem Youth & Family Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICT: $127,650 · OtherCHEHALEM PARK & REC DISTRICTNEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICT: $62,676 · OtherNEWBERG SCHOOL DISTRICTHELPING HANDS: $46,775 · OtherHELPING HANDSNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $46,000 · OtherNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN CHURCHWORLD COMMUNITY SERVICE: $42,658 · OtherWORLD COMMUNITY SERVICENEWBERG ROTARY EARLY BIRDS: $42,275 · OtherNEWBERG ROTARY EARLY BIRDSNEWBERG ROTARY CLUB: $20,750 · Other+11 more: $111,645 · Other+11 moreVIVIAN LEE FOUNDATION: $13,880 · HealthChehalem Youth & Family Services: $8,000 · HealthYAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY: $20,000 · Community ImprovementNEWBERG BOOSTER CLUB INC: $15,000 · EducationTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 · International
Other$500,429Health$21,880Community Improvement$20,000Education$15,000International$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEWBERG ROTARY CLUB: $20,750 over 2y, 27% of budgetYAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY: $20,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetNEWBERG BOOSTER CLUB INC: $15,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetVIVIAN LEE FOUNDATION: $13,880 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEWBERG ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds YAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEWBERG BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds VIVIAN LEE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWBERG EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Library Foundation of Newberg ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Chehalem Youth & Family Services ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Family FoundationOR17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Family Foundation · Newberg Early Birds Rotary Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Newberg Rotary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Newberg Rotary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Newberg Rotary Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Newberg Rotary Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Newberg Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph