Skip to content
Newberg Early Birds Rotary Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Newberg Early Birds Rotary Foundation

The Newberg Early Birds Rotary Foundation's primary purpose is to fund projects in and around the newberg, oregon community

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$100kEducation$99kInternational$62kHuman Services$53kReligion$42kPhilanthropy$39kHealth$38kCommunity Improvement$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $51,650, the rows itemized in this filing. The $73,589 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,939 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY CLUB OF NEWBERG$21,650
NEWBERG DOWNTOWN COALITION$20,000
NEWBERG ANIMAL SHELTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SVC NW: $8k → 9%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SVC NW: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$367k · 8 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$367k
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+13%

Still filing today

63%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Rotary Club of Newberg Earlybirds
    7× · 2017–2025 · $123k · revenue 0%
  • CP
    CHEHALEM PARK AND REC DISTRI
    2× · 2017–2018 · $71k
  • LC
    Lutheran Community Services Northwest
    3× · 2018–2023 · $43k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • EV
    EDWARDS VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue -32% · 27% of their budget
  • NB
    NEWBERG BOOSTER CLUB INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -24%
  • CO
    CITY OF DUNDEEE
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Library Foundation of Newberg

The Library Foundation of Newberg provides critical support to the Newberg Public Library resulting in free programs resources and services available to all adults children and youth of the Newberg-Dundee area.

—
2
Earth Day Oregon
—
3
Prineville Downtown Association

Economic development of rural Oregon towns

Community Improvement
4
Metro Portland New Car Dealers Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Oregon Cascades West Senior Services Foundation

To provide Assistance to Senior Citizen Programs

Human Services
6
Coquille Rotary Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
7
North Bend Elementary Pta

To support the education, health and welfare of all children and youth.

Education
8
Dream Boosters

The booster club exists for the purpose of broadening the involvement of athletes athlete families and Oregon Dream Teams through support for the athletic programs The booster club works to achieve this through active participation of as…

Education
9
Kiwanis Club of Newburgh Foundation Inc
—
10
Newburgh Elementary School Pat Inc
Youth Development
11
Pta Oregon Congress

School PTA

—
12
Oregon Websites and Watershed Project Inc

Develop educational network to communicate historical and scientific information empasizing natural and cultural resources to pacific northwest.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rotary Club of Newberg Earlybirds; the most unlike its peers is National Society of the Colonial Dames of America in the State of Oregon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rotary Club of Newberg Earlybirds: $123,336 · OtherRotary Club of Newberg EarlybirdsCHEHALEM PARK AND REC DISTRI: $70,637 · OtherCHEHALEM PARK AND REC DISTRINEWBERG HIGH SCHOOL: $34,360 · OtherNEWBERG HIGH SCHOOLNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $32,051 · OtherNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN CHURCHCITY OF DUNDEEE: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $34,043 · Other+4 moreEDWARDS VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION: $17,000 · EducationEDWARDS VOLUN…Partners In Education: $17,000 · EducationPartners In E…NEWBERG BOOSTER CLUB INC: $15,000 · EducationNEWBERG BOOST…ANTONIA CRATER PTO: $8,000 · EducationANTONIA CRATE…CHEMEKETA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,409 · EducationCHEMEKETA COM…PROVIDENCE NEWBERG HEALTH FOUNDATION: $27,500 · HealthPROVIDENC…VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 · HealthVIRGINIA …COMMUNITY WELLNESS COLLECTIVE: $7,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY…Lutheran Community Services Northwest: $42,500 · Human ServicesLutheran …NEWBERG DOWNTOWN COALITION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNational Society of the Colonial Dames of America in the State of Oregon: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNEWBERG ANIMAL SHELTER FRIENDS: $20,000 · AnimalsNEWBERG BASEBALL: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentYAMHILL ENRICHMENT SOCIETY: $10,560 · Community Improvement
Other$309,427Education$64,409Health$45,000Human Services$42,500Arts & Culture$30,000Animals$20,000Youth Development$12,000Community Improvement$10,560

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRotary Club of Newberg Earlybirds: $123,336 over 7y, 23% of budgetLutheran Community Services Northwest: $42,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE NEWBERG HEALTH FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNEWBERG ANIMAL SHELTER FRIENDS: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetEDWARDS VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION: $17,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetPartners In Education: $17,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetNEWBERG BOOSTER CLUB INC: $15,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetNEWBERG BASEBALL: $12,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Society of the Colonial Dames of America in the State of Oregon: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetANTONIA CRATER PTO: $8,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY WELLNESS COLLECTIVE: $7,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCHEMEKETA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,409 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Family Foundat…Providence Health & S…The Oregon Community …Newberg Rotary Founda…The Ford Family Found…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Austin Family FoundationOR22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Family Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · The Oregon Community Foundation · Newberg Rotary Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Newberg Early Birds Rotary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Newberg Early Birds Rotary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Chemeketa Community College Foundation: 22% of income from government
  • Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center: 11% of income from government
  • Newberg Downtown Coalition: 7% of income from government
  • Newberg Animal Shelter Friends: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Newberg Early Birds Rotary’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home