Skip to content
New York Society of Cosmetic Chemists Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New York Society of Cosmetic Chemists Inc

Dedicated to the advancement of cosmetic science.

$275k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$123kEducation$113kScience & Tech$62kEnvironment$9k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $106,406, the rows itemized in this filing. The $275,395 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $168,989 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $97k
$12,594
Median grant
4
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
P2 SCIENCE INC$24,707
OLAPLEX$21,806
NOVA PERSONAL CARE LABS INC$16,800
BASF CORPORATION$12,594
ESSNTLS LAB LLC$11,002
GRANT INDUSTRIES$10,352
PHYTOGENX INC$9,145
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PHYTOGENX INC: $9k → 11%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $8k → 11%OLAPLEX: $22k → 14%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 14%SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS: $16k → 17%P2 SCIENCE INC: $25k → 12%NOVA PERSONAL CARE LABS INC: $17k → 4%BASF CORPORATION: $13k → 4%PACE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORP: $6k → 6%ESSNTLS LAB LLC: $11k → 7%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $44k → 8%TRENTON CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $5k → 11%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT: $2k → 16%CHEMICAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS: $10k → 17%RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%RIDER UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT: $1k → 16%RAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $17k → 7%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ: $6k → 8%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 7%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $13k → 7%GRANT INDUSTRIES: $10k → 7%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 5 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -6% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$162k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
-10%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24
EducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $84k · revenue -13%
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University
    4× · 2017–2021 · $46k · revenue -6%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $26k · revenue -43%

Funded once

  • MC
    MUHLENBERG COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -2%
  • PF
    PROGRAM FOR ACCELERATION IN CAREERS OF ENGINEERING
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -93%
  • RT
    RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
4
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ramapo College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Program for Acceleration in Careers of Engineering. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $83,500 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONFairleigh Dickinson University: $46,000 · EducationFairleigh Dickinson UniversityMUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $7,500 · Education+4 more: $16,000 · Education+4 moreP2 SCIENCE INC: $24,707 · OtherP2 SCIENCE INCOLAPLEX: $21,806 · OtherOLAPLEXNOVA PERSONAL CARE LABS INC: $16,800 · OtherNOVA PERSONAL CARE LABS INCBASF CORPORATION: $12,594 · OtherBASF CORPORATIONESSNTLS LAB LLC: $11,002 · OtherESSNTLS LAB LLCGRANT INDUSTRIES: $10,352 · OtherGRANT INDUSTRIESPhytogenX: $9,145 · OtherPhytogenXPROGRAM FOR ACCELERATION IN CAREERS OF ENGINEERING: $6,000 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherChemical Educational Foundation: $5,000 · OtherTrenton Catholic Academy: $5,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS: $26,250 · Science & TechSOCIETY O…
Education$153,000Other$128,406Science & Tech$26,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $83,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $46,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF COSMETIC CHEMISTS: $26,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROGRAM FOR ACCELERATION IN CAREERS OF ENGINEERING: $6,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetRIDER UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChemical Educational Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New York Society of Cosmetic Chemists Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New York Society of Cosmetic Chemists Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
  • Ramapo College Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Rider University: 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New York Society of Cosmetic Chemists’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home