Skip to content
New York Ehealth Collaborative Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New York Ehealth Collaborative Inc

New york ehealth collaborative (nyec) works to improve healthcare for all new yorkers through health information technology (health it).

$68M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$365M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,358,892
Median grant
1
States reached
$88M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHIX INC$23,500,369
HEALTHECONNECTIONS INC$11,705,914
GREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATION INC$7,875,718
HEALTHELINK INC$7,358,892
HEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC$7,225,504
BRONX RHIO INC$5,964,561
TECHNOLOGY BY DESIGN INC$4,122,596
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MASSACHUSETTS EHEALTH COLLABORATIVE INC: $274k → 8%HEALTHIX INC: $18.9M → 7%HEALTHELINK INC: $7.4M → 13%HEALTH ADVANCEMENT COLLABORATIVE OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $20.9M → 14%GREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATION INC: $12.5M → 14%TECHNOLOGY BY DESIGN INC: $4.1M → 14%HEALTHIX INC: $23.5M → 17%BRONX RHIO INC: $6.4M → 28%TECHLEADERS CONSULTING LLC: $2.0M → 7%WESTERN NEW YORK CLINICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $7.2M → 13%HEALTHECONNECTIONS INC: $11.7M → 14%GREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATION INC: $7.9M → 14%HEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC: $7.2M → 14%HEALTHIX INC: $19.5M → 17%BRONX RHIO INC: $6.0M → 28%TECHLEADERS CONSULTING LLC: $721k → 7%WNY CLINICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $7.1M → 13%HEALTH ADVANCEMENT COLLABORATIVE OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $11.1M → 14%GREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATION INC: $6.8M → 14%HEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC: $7.1M → 14%HEALTHIX INC: $6.9M → 17%BRONX RHIO INC: $5.9M → 28%INTEGRATED MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS PLLC: $118k → 7%WESTERN NEW YORK CLINICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $6.7M → 13%HEALTHECONNECTIONS HACCNY: $10.9M → 14%GREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATION INC: $6.5M → 14%HEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC: $7.1M → 14%BRONX RHIO INC: $5.1M → 28%TECHLEADERS CONSULTING LLC: $250k → 7%WESTERN NEW YORK CLINICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $6.3M → 13%HEALTHECONNECTIONS (HACCNY): $10.8M → 14%GREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION: $6.2M → 14%HEALTH CENTER NETWORK OF NEW YORK: $333k → 14%BRONX RHIO INC: $5.0M → 28%WNY CLINICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $6.1M → 13%HEALTH ADVANCEMENT COLLABORATIVE OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $10.6M → 14%GREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION: $6.2M → 14%HEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC: $6.6M → 14%HEALTHLINKNY INC: $1.8M → 14%STRATEGIC INTERESTS LLC: $127k → 14%HEALTHIX INC: $23.3M → 17%BRONX RHIO INC: $4.8M → 28%EHR ADVISORY GROUP LLC: $294k → 14%HEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC: $6.1M → 14%HEALTHIX INC: $19.3M → 17%MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $556k → 17%STRATEGIC INTERESTS LLC: $649k → 14%HEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC: $5.9M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345M · 9 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$345M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+10%

Still filing today

78%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HEALTHIX INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $111M · revenue +44% · 99% of their budget
  • HI
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $40M · revenue +34% · 74% of their budget
  • HI
    HEALTHELINK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $35M · revenue +15% · 57% of their budget

Funded once

  • WC
    WNY CLINICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $6.1M
  • IR
    Interboro Regional Health Information Organization Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5.6M · revenue 0% · 94% of their budget
  • HI
    HEALTHLINKNY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1.8M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Ehealth Collaborative Inc

New york ehealth collaborative (nyec) works to improve healthcare for all new yorkers through health information technology (health it). founded in 2006 by healthcare leaders, nyec is designated by the state to serve as the focal point for…

Health
2
HealthInfoNet
Public Benefit
3
Hawaii Health Information Exchange

Hawai'i health information exchange is the state's designated entity for health data exchange. we provide the technology, technical expertise, and governance that enables health care providers and stakeholders to share and access complete…

Public Benefit
4
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
5
Gotham Health Fqhc Inc

Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…

Health
6
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
7
Hackensack Specialty Care Associates Pc

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

Health
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
10
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
11
IHealth Inc

A statewide coalition of community-based service providers that perform care management services for chronically ill low-income individuals in New York State. Members work together to advance important role of care manag

Health
12
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthelink Inc; the most unlike its peers is Massachusetts E-Health Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHIX INC: $111,298,005 · Public BenefitHEALTHIX INCHEALTHECONNECTIONS INC: $75,995,175 · Public BenefitHEALTHECONNECTIONS INCGREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATION INC: $46,098,369 · Public BenefitGREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATION INCBRONX RHIO INC: $33,237,880 · Public BenefitBRONX RHIO INC+1 more: $4,122,596 · Public BenefitHEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC: $39,958,047 · HealthHEALTHCARE INFORMATION …HEALTHELINK INC: $34,649,347 · HealthHEALTHELINK INC+5 more: $1,193,400 · HealthWNY CLINICAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $6,080,569 · OtherInterboro Regional Health Information Organization Inc: $5,567,356 · OtherTECHLEADERS CONSULTING LLC: $2,962,625 · OtherHEALTHLINKNY INC: $1,755,691 · OtherSTRATEGIC INTERESTS LLC: $816,675 · Other+6 more: $847,700 · Other
Public Benefit$270,752,025Health$75,800,794Other$18,030,616

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTHIX INC: $111,298,005 over 6y, 99% of budgetHEALTHECONNECTIONS INC: $75,995,175 over 6y, 93% of budgetGREATER ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION ORGANIZATION INC: $46,098,369 over 6y, 73% of budgetHEALTHCARE INFORMATION XCHANGE OF NEW YORK INC: $39,958,047 over 6y, 74% of budgetHEALTHELINK INC: $34,649,347 over 5y, 57% of budgetBRONX RHIO INC: $33,237,880 over 6y, 74% of budgetInterboro Regional Health Information Organization Inc: $5,567,356 over 1y, 94% of budgetTECHNOLOGY BY DESIGN INC: $4,122,596 over 1y, 94% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $556,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH CENTER NETWORK OF NEW YORK INC: $442,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS E-HEALTH COLLABORATIVE: $273,775 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC: $112,050 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $55,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK STATE COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC: $45,250 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetFINGER LAKES HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENCY: $27,900 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New York Ehealth Collaborative Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New York Ehealth Collaborative Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New York Ehealth Collaborative’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home