Skip to content

· Private foundation

New Life Christian Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2018
7
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Religion$25kCrime & Legal$12kEducation$2k
02FY2018 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,150
Median grant
4
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALM DESERT COMM PRESB CHURCH$6,500
CHRISTIAN CHAPLAIN SERVICES-GREENLE$6,000
Greeving Teens of the Desert$2,000
NARRAMORE CHRISTIAN FOUND$1,150
University of NORTHWESTERN-KTIS$1,000
NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT-EVAN FREE CH$1,000
BILLY GRAHAM ASSOCIATION$500
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39k · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$39k
$0

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PD
    PALM DESERT COMM PRESB CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CHAPLAIN SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue -53%
  • GT
    Greeving Teens of the Desert
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    03Its field
    03the grantee network

    2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    2/2
    Grantees still filing
    1/2
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    PALM DESERT COMM PRESB CHURCH: $14,125 · OtherPALM DESERT COMM PRESB CHURCHGreeving Teens of the Desert: $4,000 · OtherGreeving Teens of the DesertNORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT-EVAN FREE CH: $3,000 · OtherNORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT-EVAN FREE CHUniversity of NORTHWESTERN-KTIS: $2,000 · OtherUniversity of NORTHWESTERN-KTISBILLY GRAHAM ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM ASSOCIATIONCHRISTIAN CHAPLAIN SERVICES INC: $12,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN CHAPLAIN SERVICES INCNARRAMORE CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,150 · ReligionNARRAMORE CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC
    Other$24,625Religion$14,150

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTIAN CHAPLAIN SERVICES INC: $12,000 over 2y, 13% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CHRISTIAN CHAPLAIN SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds NARRAMORE CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization New Life Christian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Life Christian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      04Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to New Life Christian Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to New Life Christian Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on New Life Christian’s filings →

      More from the funding graph