Skip to content

· Public charity

New Jersey AIDS Walk Inc

To raise awareness and funds in support of aids service organizations.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MRecreation & Sports$33k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$9,055
Median grant
1
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE$23,392
NORTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE$20,005
EDGE$9,055
THE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK$6,746
BUDDIES OF NEW JERSEY$6,296
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $183k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%THE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK: $49k → 6%THE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK: $46k → 6%THE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK: $39k → 6%THE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK: $24k → 6%THE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK: $19k → 6%THE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK: $7k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 5 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$1.3M
$33k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    SOUTH JERSEY AGAINST AIDS INC DBA SOUTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $328k · revenue +66%
  • EN
    EDGE NEW JERSEY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $317k · revenue +286%
  • NJ
    NORTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $263k · revenue +368%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK
    one grant, 2017 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDGE NEW JERSEY INC: $317,484 · OtherEDGE NEW JERSEY INCNORTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE INC: $263,087 · OtherNORTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE INCTHE CENTER AT ASBURY PARK: $33,423 · OtherTHE CENTER AT ASBURY PARKSOUTH JERSEY AGAINST AIDS INC DBA SOUTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE: $327,899 · HealthSOUTH JERSEY AGAINST AIDS INC DBA SOUTH JERSEY…BUDDIES OF NEW JERSEY INC: $235,372 · HealthBUDDIES OF NEW JERSEY INCTHE CENTER IN ASBURY PARK INC: $183,420 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER IN A…
Other$613,994Health$563,271Human Services$183,420

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH JERSEY AGAINST AIDS INC DBA SOUTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE: $327,899 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetEDGE NEW JERSEY INC: $317,484 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetNORTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE INC: $263,087 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBUDDIES OF NEW JERSEY INC: $235,372 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CENTER IN ASBURY PARK INC: $183,420 over 8y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTH JERSEY AGAINST AIDS INC DBA SOUTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds EDGE NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH JERSEY AIDS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BUDDIES OF NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER IN ASBURY PARK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Jersey AIDS Walk Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Jersey AIDS Walk Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • The Center in Asbury Park Inc: 100% of income from government
  • North Jersey Aids Alliance Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Buddies of New Jersey Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Edge New Jersey Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to New Jersey AIDS Walk Inc?

Find your warmest path to New Jersey AIDS Walk Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New Jersey AIDS Walk’s filings →

More from the funding graph