· Public charity
New Hampshire Juvenile Court Diversion Network
The Network supports accredited Diversion programs for at-risk youth involved with law enforcement to hold them accountable for their actions, ignite growth and community engagement, and encourage opportunities to develop compassion and connection with those they have harmed.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $942k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Nashua Police Athletic League | $69,642 |
| Merrimack County Juvenile Services | $61,048 |
| Greater Derry Juvenile Diversion | $60,475 |
| Valley Court Diversion | $57,589 |
| City of Keene Youth Services | $56,488 |
| Hillsboro Juvenile Court Diversion Program | $56,166 |
| Seacoast Community Diversion Program | $54,748 |
| Individual grant recipient | $54,265 |
| Sullivan County Court Diversion | $54,140 |
| CADY Inc | $53,701 |
| Belknap County Restorative Justice | $53,131 |
| Grafton County Juvenile Restorative Justice | $52,965 |
| Manchester Police Athletic League | $52,491 |
| Goffstown Area Juvenile Diversion | $52,174 |
| Youth Assistance Program Tilton | $51,130 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $459k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VCValley Court Diversion Programs Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $181k · revenue +81%
- MPMANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE7× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +87%
- TUTHE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER4× · 2022–2025 · $93k · revenue +1%
Funded once
JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $57k · revenue +99%- WMWHITE MOUNTAIN RESTORATIVE JUSTICEone grant, 2017 · $26k
- GCGRAFTON COUNTY JUVENILE RESTORATIVE JUSTICEone grant, 2021 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Network supports accredited Diversion programs for at-risk youth involved with law enforcement to hold them accountable for their actions, ignite growth and community engagement, and encourage opportunities to develop compassion and…
Provide educational prevention programs to youths.
The mission of the NH Providers Association is to represent its members in advancing substance use prevention, treatment and recovery through public policy, leadership, professional development, and quality member services. We envision a…
To educate the community about drug and alcohol abuse.
The Associations mission is to provide quality education, workforce development, advocacy, ethical standards and leadership for addiction professionals. The Association empowers efforts in prevention, treatment and recovery.
To work towards creating healthy, safer, stronger, and more connected communities through educating youth in restorative justice and by giving youth respondents a second chance to be part of the community.
To create community partnerships to implement universal substance abuse prevention strategies to promote the health and safety of individuals across the lifespan, especially among youth.
Juvenile crime prevention
Enable young people to benefit from participation in team sports and activities in a safe and structured environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cady Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Upper Room a Family Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Valley Court Diversion Programs Inc ↗
- Who funds THE YOUTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds THE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Nashua Police Athletic League ↗
- Who funds CADY INC ↗
- Who funds JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OF NORTHFIELD SANBORNTON AND TILTON INC ↗
- Who funds North Country Health Consortium Inc ↗
- Who funds Families in Transition ↗
- Who funds DOVER POLICE CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Hampshire Juvenile Court Diversion Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Valley Court Diversion Programs Inc — 84% of income from government
- Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc — 69% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Hampshire Juvenile Court Diversion Network?
Find your warmest path to New Hampshire Juvenile Court Diversion Network through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.