Skip to content
New Hampshire Community Loan Fund Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New Hampshire Community Loan Fund Inc

Our mission is to provide people and communities, in new hampshire and beyond, with the financial, human, and civic resources they need to be economically secure.

$42M
Granted FY2025still arriving
90
Grants FY2025still arriving
38
States reached
$8.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$31MScience & Tech$3.9MEmployment$3.5MCommunity Improvement$2.8MYouth Development$2.2MHealth$2.0MArts & Culture$833kHuman Services$779kOther$0
02FY2025 · 90 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $316k
  • $50k–250k38 grants · $6.4M
  • $250k+37 grants · $35M
$245,804
Median grant
38
States reached
$237M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICA'S HEARTLAND PACKING LLC$8,211,944
KORTE MEAT PROCESSORS INC$3,358,789
NINE TWENTY PROCESSING LLC$2,526,840
NOAH'S ARK PROCESSORS LLC$2,115,945
JM WATKINS LLC$1,368,192
BEHRMANN MEAT & PROCESSING$1,321,078
CREAM CO LLC$1,199,307
SMOKING PIG LLC$1,136,519
JESSICA ROOSA DBA THIS OLD FARM INC$1,069,489
EDGEWOOD LOCKER INC$1,052,377
CLEAN CHICKENS AND CO LLC$784,428
STEVE AND LAURA 2 LLC$779,054
SEVEN HILLS FOOD LLC$770,247
OZARK PLATEAU PORK LLC$745,555
SONOMA COUNTY MEAT CO LLC$735,990
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASC LOCKERS LLC: $381k → 10%NOAH'S ARK PROCESSORS LLC: $2.1M → 11%OXFORD PACKING LLC: $250k → 13%AMERICA'S HEARTLAND PACKING LLC: $8.2M → 6%CLEAN CHICKENS AND CO LLC: $784k → 6%WASECA MORGAN'S MEAT MARKET LLC: $250k → 8%FEDDES FAMILY MEATS INC: $250k → 10%GLACIER PROCESSING COOPERATIVE: $250k → 11%HAMILTON PACK LLC: $250k → 11%S RANCH MEATS LLC: $250k → 23%CREAM CO LLC: $1.2M → 10%FIVE MARYS CUSTOM MEAT CO: $250k → 16%I'O PROCESSING COMPANY INC: $612k → 15%TEXAS PRIDE PROCESSING LLC: $610k → 15%EDGEWOOD LOCKER INC: $1.1M → 12%CJV LLC: $250k → 17%STEVE AND LAURA 2 LLC: $779k → 11%DURAND MEAT PROCESSING: $285k → 12%FRONTIER MEAT PACKING LLC: $503k → 18%MEADE LOCKER & PROCESSING LLC: $250k → 10%KREHBIELS SPECIALTY MEATS INC: $250k → 10%J&J PROCESSING: $250k → 13%OZARK PLATEAU PORK LLC: $746k → 17%CLARKS CUSTOM MEAT CO: $250k → 18%JM WATKINS LLC: $1.4M → 9%CRESCENT MEATS LLC: $425k → 10%WATERLOO POULTRY PROCESSING: $250k → 10%MEATING PLACE LLC: $250k → 8%REVEL MEAT COMPANY: $250k → 8%GREENE GRAIN AND CATTLE LLC: $527k → 25%PAT'S PASTURED LLC: $250k → 7%FLINT PACKERS LLC: $402k → 22%NINE TWENTY PROCESSING LLC: $2.5M → 28%DEWIG BROS PACKING CO INC: $250k → 10%JESSICA ROOSA DBA THIS OLD FARM INC: $1.1M → 11%PRIME CUT 41 LLC: $250k → 12%FISHER PACKING COMPANY: $282k → 14%SMOKING PIG LLC: $1.1M → 10%PURE COUNTRY HARVEST LLC: $504k → 14%BEHRMANN MEAT & PROCESSING: $1.3M → 8%KORTE MEAT PROCESSORS INC: $3.4M → 12%SEVEN HILLS FOOD LLC: $770k → 13%MAPLE RIDGE MEATS LLC: $250k → 12%WOODBURY COOPERATIVE INC: $451k → 5%GRANITE STATE PACKING INC: $444k → 10%MONTSHIRE PACKING LLC: $357k → 10%MICHIGAN TURKEY PRODUCERS CO-OP INC: $250k → 11%SONOMA COUNTY MEAT CO LLC: $736k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

4%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 10 repeat orgs$47M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 82 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
27

Total granted

$2.2M
$6.0M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WOODBURY COOPERATIVE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $475k
  • PL
    PARADISE LOCKER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $250k
  • SC
    Short Creek Meats LLC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $250k

Funded once

  • MP
    MEATING PLACE LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • ML
    MEADE LOCKER & PROCESSING LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • HP
    HAMILTON PACK LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICA'S HEARTLAND PACKING LLC: $8,211,944 · OtherAMERICA'S HEARTLAND PACKING LLCKORTE MEAT PROCESSORS INC: $3,358,789 · OtherKORTE MEAT PROCESSORS INCNINE TWENTY PROCESSING LLC: $2,526,840 · OtherNOAH'S ARK PROCESSORS LLC: $2,115,945 · Other+113 more: $32,809,682 · Other+113 moreTHE LIVESTOCK INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC: $179,309 · Food & NutritionREGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE ALLIANCE: $44,600 · Food & Nutrition
Other$49,023,200Food & Nutrition$223,909

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCADMUS CORPORATION: $10,173 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Ninetwelve Institute …
Ninetwelve Institute IncIN12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ninetwelve Institute Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Hampshire Community Loan Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Hampshire Community Loan Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Hampshire Community Loan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home