Skip to content
New England Baptist Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

New England Baptist Hospital

The mission of NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL (nebh or hospital) is the operation and maintenance of an acute care, orthopedic specialty hospital and provision of all services related thereto for the benefit of nebh patients.

$506k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$371k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$324kYouth Development$314kHealth$298kHousing & Shelter$133kCommunity Improvement$64kEmployment$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $490,232, the rows itemized in this filing. The $506,415 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,183 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $371k
$24,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$263M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF BOSTON$370,872
MISSION HILL LINK INC$50,000
ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD ASSOCIATION INC$24,300
MISSION HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING$16,210
TOBIN COMMUNITY CTRMISSION HILL COMMUNITY SCHOOL COUNCIL INC$15,750
MISSION HILL MAIN STREETS$13,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $586k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD ASSOCIATION INC: $24k → 16%ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD ASSOCIATION INC: $22k → 16%ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD: $20k → 16%ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD: $14k → 16%ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD: $10k → 16%ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD: $9k → 16%ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD: $7k → 16%ROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD: $6k → 16%MISSION HILL LINK: $70k → 16%MISSION HILL LINK: $53k → 16%MISSION HILL LINK: $51k → 16%MISSION HILL LINK INC: $50k → 16%MISSION HILL LINK INC: $50k → 16%MISSION HILL LINK: $50k → 16%MISSION HILL LINK: $50k → 16%MISSION HILL LINK: $50k → 16%MISSION LINK INC: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of New England Baptist Hospital’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 80%.

New England Baptist Hospitallessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$407k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$1.2M
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-27%

Still filing today

69%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $371k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MISSION HILL LINK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $474k · revenue +44% · 42% of their budget
  • BC
    BOSTON CELTICS SHAMROCK FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $273k · revenue +148%
  • SOCIEDAD LATINA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $78k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • BC
    BOSTON CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES-TOBIN COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • MG
    MISSION GRAMMAR SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • MH
    MISSION HILL PROBLEM PROPTERTIES-CAPITAL WASTE SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
2
Cambridge Street Community Development Corporation

To further the rational development of the cambridge street area of the city of boston and its environments.

—
3
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
4
Massachusetts Health & Hospital Assoc Inc

To advance the health of individuals and communities by serving as the leading voice for all massachusetts hospitals and healthcare systems and to help them provide high quality, cost-effective and equitable patient care.

—
5
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
6
Boston Municipal Research Bureau

To provide objective and impartial research and policy analysis in order to promote more efficient, effective and responsible government for the city of boston.

Public Benefit
7
Rth Mission Park Realty Corporation

Rth mission park realty corporation (the "corporation") was organized exclusively to benefit, perform thenfunctions of, and carry out the purposes of roxbury tenants of harvard association, inc., a massachusetts charitable corporation…

Housing & Shelter
8
Historic Boston Incorporated
—
9
Massachusetts Council of Human Services Providers Inc

To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.

—
10
Massachusetts Fair Housing Center Inc

Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.

Housing & Shelter
11
Massachusetts Council of Community Hospitals Inc

Support the advocacy of community hospitals.

Health
12
Boston Affordable Housing Coalition Inc

Preserve affordable low income housing in boston and the surrounding area

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Hill Neighborhood Housing Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY: $370,872 · OtherBOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITYBOSTON CELTICS SHAMROCK FOUNDATION INC: $273,458 · OtherBOSTON CELTICS SHAMROCK FOUNDATION INCARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherARTHRITIS FOUNDATIONCITY OF BOSTON: $46,319 · OtherCITY OF BOSTONMission Hill Community School Council Inc: $31,500 · Other+4 more: $49,920 · Other+4 moreMISSION HILL LINK INC: $473,971 · Human ServicesMISSION HILL LINK INCROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD ASSOCIATION INC: $111,566 · Human ServicesROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD ASSOCIATION I…SOCIEDAD LATINA INC: $78,000 · Youth DevelopmentMISSION HILL MAIN STREETS INC: $51,217 · Community ImprovementTHE BOSTON CLUB INC: $6,000 · Community ImprovementMISSION HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $48,321 · Housing & ShelterMETROPOLITAN BOSTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC D/B/A METRO HOUSING BOSTON: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthMorgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc: $10,000 · Employment
Other$837,069Human Services$585,537Youth Development$78,000Community Improvement$57,217Housing & Shelter$55,821Health$10,000Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION HILL LINK INC: $473,971 over 9y, 42% of budgetBOSTON CELTICS SHAMROCK FOUNDATION INC: $273,458 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetROXBURY TENANTS OF HARVARD ASSOCIATION INC: $111,566 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIEDAD LATINA INC: $78,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMISSION HILL MAIN STREETS INC: $51,217 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetMISSION HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $48,321 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BOSTON CENTERS FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES INC: $19,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMorgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN BOSTON HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC D/B/A METRO HOUSING BOSTON: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOSTON CLUB INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mass General Brigham …Eastern Bank Foundati…Mission Hillfenway Ne…Children's Hospital C…Boston Foundation IncPresident and Fellows…Liberty Mutual Founda…United Way Of Massach…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group ReturnMA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return · Eastern Bank Foundation · Mission Hillfenway Neighborhood Trust Inc · Children's Hospital Corporation · Boston Foundation Inc · President and Fellows of Harvard College · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New England Baptist Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New England Baptist Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Mission Hill Link Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Sociedad Latina Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Boston Celtics Shamrock Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New England Baptist Hospital’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home