Skip to content
New Covenant Farms Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

New Covenant Farms Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$249kHuman Services$50kFood & Nutrition$20kInternational$12kCivil Rights$10kHealth$5kRecreation & Sports$4kPublic Benefit$25Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$27,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$465k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Power Ministries International Inc$105,000
Desert Hills Community Church of the Nazarene$37,000
Gooding County Senior Center$27,500
Master Minded Ministries$15,000
World Impact Network$10,000
Helping Hearts & Hands$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%World Impact Network: $10k → 9%World Impact Network: $7k → 9%World Impact Network: $1k → 9%World Impact Network: $500 → 9%Helping Hearts & Hands: $3k → 13%Helping Hearts & Hands: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MI
NJ
CA
CO
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 8 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$299k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+32%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    POWER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $123k · revenue +337%
  • MM
    Master Minded Ministries Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +280%
  • Mercy Ships International
    4× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PM
    POWER MINISTRY
    one grant, 2018 · $21k · revenue +10%
  • VO
    VARIOUS ORPHANAGES IN TEXAS AND MEX
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
2
A2 Ministries International Ltd
Religion
3
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
4
Christian Ministries International
—
5
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

—
6
Missions Ministry and Media Foundation
—
7
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
8
Rod Hoskins Ministries

Missionary work

Religion
9
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
10
Mr Mike Ministries
Religion
11
New Heart World Ministries
Religion
12
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Power Ministry; the most unlike its peers is Master Minded Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POWER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $122,525 · OtherPOWER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INCDesert Hills Community Church of the Nazarene: $84,600 · OtherDesert Hills Community Church of the NazareneGooding County Senior Center: $29,500 · OtherGooding County Senior CenterVARIOUS ORPHANAGES IN TEXAS AND MEX: $13,761 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherOperational Mobilization USA: $9,900 · Other+6 more: $12,513 · OtherPOWER MINISTRY: $21,000 · Human ServicesPOWER MINISTRYWorld Impact Network: $18,500 · Human ServicesWorld Impact N…HELPING HEARTS AND HANDS INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HEARTS…Master Minded Ministries Inc: $17,500 · ReligionVision For The Kingdom: $2,500 · ReligionMercy Ships International: $11,050 · InternationalRICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES: $800 · InternationalTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $25 · Public Benefit
Other$282,799Human Services$45,000Religion$20,000International$11,850Public Benefit$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOWER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $122,525 over 5y, 19% of budgetPOWER MINISTRY: $21,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetWorld Impact Network: $18,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetMaster Minded Ministries Inc: $17,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMercy Ships International: $11,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HEARTS AND HANDS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetVision For The Kingdom: $2,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetRICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POWER MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds POWER MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds World Impact Network ↗
  • Who funds Master Minded Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HEARTS AND HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Vision For The Kingdom ↗
  • Who funds RICK CAYWOOD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Covenant Farms Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Covenant Farms Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Covenant Farms Inc?

    Find your warmest path to New Covenant Farms Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Covenant Farms’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home