Skip to content
New Angeles Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

New Angeles Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$538kHealth$30kInternational$15kPhilanthropy$6kCivil Rights$2kEducation$2kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$161k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION AND YESHIVA BETH HILLEL$30,000
CONGREGATION DORG$15,000
CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC$10,000
BETH TEFILLA OF MONSEY$5,800
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hachnasas Kallah Of Greater Los Ang: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$529k · 16 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$529k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

31%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2022 · $55k · revenue +37%
  • CD
    CONGREGATION DORG
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +23%
  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV OF SOUTH FALLSBURG INC ELIMELECH TRESS
    3× · 2019–2021 · $9k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CK
    CONGREGATION KEHILLAS YAAKOVBETH CH
    one grant, 2019 · $28k
  • BM
    BEIS MEDRASH OF HANCOCK PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
5
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
6
Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc
Religion
7
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
12
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ohr Olam Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Congregation and Yeshiva Beth Hille: $117,000 · OtherCongregation and Yeshiva Beth HilleCONGREGATION AND YESHIVA BETH HILLEL: $90,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AND YESHIVA BETH HILLELYESHIVATH TORATH EMETH ACADEMY: $53,500 · OtherYESHIVATH TORATH EMETH ACADEMYCONGREGATION KEHILLAS YAAKOVBETH CH: $28,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILLAS YAAKOVBETH CHYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF RAMAPO INC: $23,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherCONGREGATION YAD SHAUL: $20,000 · Other+12 more: $85,400 · Other+12 moreCONGREGATION DORG: $25,000 · ReligionCONGREGATION …NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS: $18,000 · ReligionNATIONAL SOCI…Kollel - Los Angeles: $15,000 · ReligionKollel - Los …MOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $7,500 · ReligionMOSDOS BETH Y…MERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $5,000 · ReligionMERKAZ HATORA…Hashkifa: $5,000 · ReligionHashkifa+1 more: $2,500 · ReligionMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Arts & CultureMESORAH H…+1 more: $1,800 · Arts & CultureBIKUR CHOLIM: $30,000 · HealthKEREN GEMILAS CHASODIM FOUNDATION CO READ PROPERTY GROUP: $15,000 · PhilanthropySHUVU RETURN INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyBAIS YAAKOV OF SOUTH FALLSBURG INC ELIMELECH TRESS: $8,600 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC: $5,000 · EducationHACHNASAS KALLAH OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$459,500Religion$78,000Arts & Culture$56,800Health$30,000Philanthropy$21,000Education$13,600Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION DORG: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN GEMILAS CHASODIM FOUNDATION CO READ PROPERTY GROUP: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKollel - Los Angeles: $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF SOUTH FALLSBURG INC ELIMELECH TRESS: $8,600 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHashkifa: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOhr Olam Corp: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA MEAH SHEARIM INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHACHNASAS KALLAH OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION DORG ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds KEREN GEMILAS CHASODIM FOUNDATION CO READ PROPERTY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Kollel - Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV OF SOUTH FALLSBURG INC ELIMELECH TRESS ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI ↗
  • Who funds SHUVU RETURN INC ↗
  • Who funds MERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABBINICAL COLLEGE NETIV HADAAT INC ↗
  • Who funds Hashkifa ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Olam Corp ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA MEAH SHEARIM INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HACHNASAS KALLAH OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Jewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundZichron Yechiel Meche…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Goldner Family Founda…The Adjmi-Dwek Founda…National Philanthropi…The Schlussel Family …The Alon and Rosana M…Rohcs Family Foundati…Chavi F Hertz Foundat…
Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA46× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Schlussel Family Foundation · The Alon and Rosana Miller Foundation · Rohcs Family Foundation Inc · Chavi F Hertz Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Angeles Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Angeles Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New Angeles’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home